Dave, see Mark Brooks' responses.
While I see this as more of a cosmetic change than anything, based on
this thread, my 2% of messages that didn't fit, wanting to satisfy the
health check without deleting it and lastly - because it can't hurt...
I have added transport class definitions to my monoplex
production and sandbox LPARs. For the production LPARs I
made the changes dynamically with SETXCF.
/****************************************/
/* MONOPLEX CLASSDEF FOR XCF MESSAGES */
/****************************************/
CLASSDEF CLASS(DEFAULT) CLASSLEN(956) GROUP(UNDESIG) MAXMSG(2000)
CLASSDEF CLASS(XCF4K) CLASSLEN(4028) GROUP(UNDESIG) MAXMSG(2000)
CLASSDEF CLASS(XCF8K) CLASSLEN(8124) GROUP(UNDESIG) MAXMSG(2000)
Below is a display from a sandbox LPAR where I IPLed with the changes over
the weekend:
D XCF,CD,CLASS=ALL
IXC344I 09.28.34 DISPLAY XCF 360
TRANSPORT CLASS DEFAULT ASSIGNED
CLASS LENGTH MAXMSG GROUPS
DEFAULT 956 2000 UNDESIG
XCF4K 4028 2000 UNDESIG
XCF8K 8124 2000 UNDESIG
DEFAULT TRANSPORT CLASS USAGE FOR SYSTEM M108
SUM MAXMSG: 2000 IN USE: 2 NOBUFF: 0
SEND CNT: 3392 BUFFLEN (FIT): 956
XCF4K TRANSPORT CLASS USAGE FOR SYSTEM M108
SUM MAXMSG: 2000 IN USE: 0 NOBUFF: 0
SEND CNT: 1255 BUFFLEN (FIT): 4028
XCF8K TRANSPORT CLASS USAGE FOR SYSTEM M108
SUM MAXMSG: 2000 IN USE: 0 NOBUFF: 0
SEND CNT: 19 BUFFLEN (FIT): 8124
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:[email protected]
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:18:31 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM <[email protected]>
wrote:
>XCF works only within a sysplex.
>D XCF,G tells you which groups have been created.
>D XCF,G,groupname,ALL tells you who has connected to the group and how
>much traffic has travelled in the group.
>
>Kees.
>
>
>"Gibney, Dave" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> I run monoplexs. Like I expect most other small shops.
>> 4 LPARS, only shared DASD, no CTC connections. There are TCPIP
>Hipersocket links, but as far as I know, XCF is not aware of these
>links. What/Who are the typical users of XCF signaling in a monoplex.
>How would I know if they are experiencing degraded or inefficient
>signaling?
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
