In <[email protected]>, on
03/29/2012
at 02:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>and it was further abridged when you quoted it.
I quoted it from your message, not from a web site. I don't see where
I deleted any relevant text.
>The larger sequence
Larger? It's shorter thabn the sequence I quoted from, e.g., it
doesn't have the "125 Sending data set SPPG.TEST.TESTPRT(TESTPRT)
FIXrecfm 80".
>The message is incorrect and misleading.
What message is incorrect? Certainly not "504 Multi-byte encoding not
supported for RECFM=FB".
>For that matter, until it was named in the "get" the FTP server
>couldn't know the RECFM of the data set.
The above message appeared *after* the get. Were you referring to
that, or to "557 Data contains codepoints that cannot be translated",
which did not appear in your "larger" sequence?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
