In <[email protected]>, on 03/27/2012
at 10:06 AM, Greg Dorner <[email protected]> said:
>Our auditors are insisting that we install a product that protects
>against malicious software (viruses, worms, trojans, etc.).
What are the politics? Are the auditors willing to assume liability if
the hypothetical package is itself a security problem?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
