On 16-Mar-12 12:03 AM, gsg wrote:
Just want to thank everyone for your comments. I think the consensus is to not
use Endevor for system type changes. I realize this would cause a lot of pain
and reduce productivity.
My next questions is how does your shop handle making system changes or
upgrading 3rd party products? Do your SYSPROGS have direct access to update
with no type of Change Control?
Thanks in advance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Years ago, while I was doing sysprog work, the audit required me, my
boss advised me, to raise system change request, and document the change
and fall-back steps if necessary.Me and my colleagues have complied to
that fully. We just have to put in documentation as part of our daily
tasks in our time-spent report.
--
Regards Lim ML
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
