In <[email protected]>,
on 03/09/2012
at 09:00 AM, Juan Mautalen <[email protected]> said:
>We currently have our VTAMLST libraries protected with UACC(READ).
>IBM suggests UACC(NONE) for them
Why?
>Human users are not my problem,
Why not? Anybody who might be asked to diagnose a network issue
potentially needs access.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
