In <[email protected]>, on 03/07/2012
   at 03:51 PM, Ed Mackmahon <[email protected]> said:

>I intend that the interface will logon to the mainframe and issue
>some operator commands,

If you really mean *operator* commands, that conflicts with

>The user which will be used for logon to the mainframe will have
>specific RACF/TSS/CA1 display only authorities

You need more than that to issue operator commands. What commands do
you need to issue and why?

>Having that, I am still looking for the preferred way for 
>interfacing in a way that most organization will have no problem 
>to authorize

If you need to run your own code on the mainframe, why bother with FTP
at all? Why not let a single address space do all the work,
communicating to the other server with TCP, or SCTP if you need to get
fancy?
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to