Got it. You da best! I will get back on this at some point soon. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353 Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 7:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Good source for relationship of opcodes, models, MACHINE() and ARCH() BTDT already. Try the attached Rexx (genoptbl.txt) (at least I hope it gets attached -- I will paste it into a new reply if it doesn't make it to the list). Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Charles Mills > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 10:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Good source for relationship of opcodes, models, > MACHINE() and ARCH() > > This was bugging me so I got a start on a document. I have a table now > (with some question marks in it) that correlates Model numbers, the > HLASM > MACHINE() option, and the XL C/C++ ARCH() option, and also the > Enterprise PL/I option ARCH() which (believe it or not!!!) is > apparently exactly equivalent to that of C/C++. > > I had the bright idea that I could run assemblies with > MACHINE(xxx,LIST) at the various levels and then use ISPF 3.12 to > determine the differences as the level changed, but HLASM prints the > opcode list in a three-column format, so nearly every line changes > from one level to the next. I have not yet come up with an approach > other than using some tool to make each list into a single column -- > but that's more work than I wanted to take on this morning. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
