I am having a hard time seeing this type of rationality put forth.  It's 
throwing me for a loop.  It's been a "peeve" of mine since I started on 
mainframes 15+ years ago.  I'm used to hearing "it's your application; you 
figure out how much space it will require, both now and 10 years down the 
line".  Never been by idea of a good use of my time.

Frank



>________________________________
> From: Chris Craddock <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:19 AM
>Subject: Re: Archaic allocation in JCL (Was: Physical record size query)
> 
>On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:21:11 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
>>
>> >Or, as the programmers at our shop would do:
>> >
>>
>> >SPACE=EAT-EVERYTHING-IN-SIGHT-AND-CAUSE-OTHER-JOBS-TO-ABEND-BECAUSE-MY-STUFF-IS-IMPORTANT-AND-YOUR-STUFF-ISNT.
>> >
>> >In many other systems, such as Winblows, everybody gets their own
>> personal "space". And if it is "used up", it doesn't impact others. z/OS
>> shares DASD space.  ...
>> >
>> The z/OS cultural norm for HFS and zFS is to give each user a
>> dedicated filesystem for HOME.  This is similar to the behavior
>> of personal instances of those "other systems".
>
>
>
>I think it is fair to say that JCL and space management are areas where
>z/OS truly is archaic. The "other" world manages to get by just fine
>without having to figure out how much resource to give. There's no reason
>z/OS couldn't do the same other than slavish adherence to legacy. IMHO it
>is about time the system itself took care answering its own incessant "how
>big?", "how many?", "how often?" questions. It's 2012 ferpetesakes. I'm all
>in favor of making sure that existing applications continue to work. I am
>far less impressed with continuing to impose 1960s thinking on new ones.
>
>
>-- 
>This email might be from the
>artist formerly known as CC
>(or not) You be the judge.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to