On 12 Feb 2012 11:10:08 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>As one of the two last sysprog's involved in the excessing of the NASA 
>"mainframe" we saw the results of the decision made many years ago to go with 
>the model of (cheaper???, smaller, better??? single server and virtual 
>servers) with all of the associated vulnerabilities and failures. 

Depending on the problems to be solved, are the p series computers a
better fit for what NASA is doing?  For management functions a
mainframe might be better but SAP runs on p as I recall.  Given that I
have used NASA goodies both on MVT and MVS, I hate to see this happen
but it may be an intelligent decision.

Clark Morris 
>
>
>*Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; 
>it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable. 
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dave Day" <[email protected]> 
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 10:39:27 AM 
>Subject: Re: NASA closes it's last mainframe 
>
>All of the people entering the astronaut program now get an Ipod. :-P 
>
>On 2/12/2012 12:35 PM, Scott Ford wrote: 
>> Very interesting , my late father had the option to see Houston Manned 
>> Spacecraft Center in the 70s or 80s. He worked for Unisys and their systems 
>> at that time were all Univac. Also around the same time Disneyworld was 
>> Unisys also. He has the option to go ack stage there also.. 
>> 
>> Now NASA is removing their mainframes, what are the replacing them with ? 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad 
>> Scott Ford 
>> Senior Systems Engineer 
>> www.identityforge.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 12, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Matthew Donald<[email protected]> 
>> wrote: 
>> 
>>>> This month marks the end of an era in NASA computing. Marshall Space 
>>>> Flight Center powered down NASA’s last mainframe, the IBM Z9 Mainframe. 
>>>> For 
>>>> my millennial readers, I suppose that I should define what a mainframe is. 
>>>> Well, that’s easier said than done, but here goes -- It’s a big 
>>>> computer that is known for being reliable, highly available, secure, and 
>>>> powerful. They are best suited for applications that are more 
>>>> transaction oriented and require a lot of input/output – that is, writing 
>>>> or reading from data storage devices. 
>>> 
>>> Read the full 
>>> article<http://blogs.nasa.gov/cm/blog/NASA-CIO-Blog/posts/post_1329017818806.html>[
>>>  
>>> blogs.nasa.gov] 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 
>> 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to