[email protected] (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes: > So even if plaintext is enough for the time being, any requirement you > submit to IBM should ask for a full implementation.
related, recent long-winded post in a different mailing list http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012b.html#71 Password shortcomings i've been somewhat paranoid for some quite some time ... part of it may have been requirement that IBM required that all links be encrypted ... in the mid-80s, there was claim that over half of link encryptors in the world were on the corporate internal network. misc. past posts mentioning internal network http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#internal recent post referencing realizing that there were three kinds of encryption: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012.html#63 Reject gmail semi-related ... old email discussing doing pgp-like email http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007d.html#email810506 http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006w.html#email810515 -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
