Ed, I'll hazard a guess that the second message was emitted from some ASM code, but the others were probably PL/S.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 3:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: $HASP165 Inconsistent Formatting Lol! Never noticed before. $HASP165 has inconsistent formatting for the same return code (zero) from one job to the next. :-D 11.25.31 J0110283 $HASP165 EJES$SAL ENDED AT PHXHQ2 MAXCC=0 CN(INTERNAL) 11.25.34 J0110285 $HASP165 EJES$DAL ENDED AT PHXHQ2 MAXCC=0000 CN(INTERNAL) 11.25.34 J0110284 $HASP165 EJES$TAL ENDED AT PHXHQ2 MAXCC=0 CN(INTERNAL) *** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
