In <[email protected]>, on
11/02/2011
at 12:31 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>Is Shmuel suggesting there were PROCs, but no symbolic parameters to
>them?
Yes, prior to Release 14, but I'm also asking whether procs were part
of the original design or added later.
>Is resolution of SET symbols performed by the C/I?
It's performed by the Converter.
>does the phase that resolves symbols pass control blocks or JCL text
>to a later phase?
The Converter generates internal text after substituting variables. In
the process it generates messages with the substituted text. It does
not generate card images.
>It's a design targeted at too little storage, resulting in too many
>phases.
Not the Reader/Interpreter[1]. Some other components, however, were a
dog's breakfast. Take allocation - please!
[1] Original name of the Converter/Interpreter plus some code
that is not relevant to MVS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
