In <[email protected]>, on
10/29/2011
at 03:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>What's "really" LF?
Move to the same column of the next line, of course. What else could
it be?
>0x0A?
That makes no sense in the context of "data where LF really means LF
and CR really means CR."
>But there's still a way out:
No; you're replacing one set of problems with another. At best it's
the least of the evils.
>Define a new code page (perhaps IBM-1047-X) with NEL at 0x25 and LF
>at 0x15; otherwise identical to IBM-1047.
With what translation from ISO-8859-1?
>Honesty is the best policy,
Define "honesty" in the context of current and proposed code-page
translations.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
