On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]> wrote: > John and Mike > > Thanks. I guess this is going to be an ETR to IBM. I am not sure how to > monitor or identify when more is better or if I can use less. This happened > after an IPL, so I am sure that there are new "UNIX" functions and it tipped > it over this limit. However, with the lack of research tools (we do D > OMVS,L every hour), it is close to impossible for me to do any type of > capacity management on this area. I would hope that IBM has tools to list > the shared libraries, modules, usage type information rather than just a > blanket - so much storage available so much storage used. To me that is > just asking for an outage of a Unix process or system failure of some kind. > > If I turn up anything with IBM I will let you know. > > This is not something I just want to blindly increase as the documentation > is not clear on how my overall system performance is going to be impacted. > > Thanks for the help > > Lizette >
Looks like the parameter value is only used once after an IPL. Increase by an amount you feel comfortable with (10%, 20%, 30%, 50%, 100%) then see if the message occurs after the next IPL, and continue monitoring actual usage. Asking support for a recommendation is fine, but their system may have a different combination of JVM functions from their machines. -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
