Cheryl, thanks for the kind words. I am in no way a professional writer, so a compliment from you is taken as a high honor.
To be honest, I still use USS as I see fit too. A few months ago, I was willing to say anything to make the tortuous arguing stop. Now, I have outlook rules in place that drop the noise level and arguments that arise when some get offended and want to labor on over non-mainframe technical issues. Tom Chicklon -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cheryl Walker Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 3:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: An unnecessary controversy (Was: Ported tools for z/OS on ADCD) Tom and others, I read my IBM-Main emails by threading them, so whenever I find a very long thread I simply delete it because I know it's been hijacked. I don't have enough time in my life to deal with those threads. For some unknown reason, I started reading this. Tom, I loved your very sane response, but as a writer and publisher I will not stop using USS when it makes sense for a couple of other reasons. IBMers use it too often to get all legal about it (as you'll see below). </snip> This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
