42,499 - 42,403 = 96 + VTOCIX, VVDS, SDSP = 101. Do a TSO ISPF 3.4 and list the datasets on the volume. You should have 101 datasets on the volume. They could be coming from datasets bigger than the SDSP size limit and there was space on the volume, or even allocated because you have it mounted as Storage or Public in your VATLSTxx.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:25 PM, willie bunter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo To All, > > I ran a report to obtain a list of SDSP dsns on an ML1 volume which is > defined as SDSP : > HSEND LIST DATASETNAME MCDS SELECT(VOLUME(ML1101) SDSP). There were 42,403 > dsns listed. I ran another report > HSEND LIST DATASETNAME MCDS SELECT(VOLUME(ML1101)). In this report there > were 42,499 dsns. My question is why is there a discrepancy? Since the > volume is defined as SDSP shouldn't only dsns that fit the criteria be housed > on the SDSP volume? Since there are 2 volumes defined as NOSDP shouldn't > they be allocated on those volumes. > I would appreciate it if someone could clear up my misunderstanding about > SDSP and NOSDP. > > Thanks. > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
