>>No, I was thinking of an SSH/rlogin/telnet environment. > >You meant that SSH/rlogin/telnet is better than SSH/rlogin/telnet? I don't get what youre asking me? This is the relevant part of the post your referring to:
>I never claimed that the OMVS command was a substitute to learning >Unix syntax; in fact, I don't see how it has any relevance to the >issue of familiarity. Were you thinking of ISHELL? No, I was thinking of an SSH/rlogin/telnet environment. ISHELL is even worse that TSO/OMVS when doing "UNIX work", i.e. running more than a single UNIX command. It is, however, a valuable interface for many other tasks. IIRC, it was about working in a UNIX shell environment that was established via TSO/OMVS versus SSH/rlogin/telnet environment. I do not consider ISHELL to be a UNIX shell environment in that context. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
