Are we ready to let this thread die? We go round and round with this without any meaningful movement from our relatively entrenched positions. Apart from some fairly humorous quips and some looooooooong winded prose there is little progress made.
I did have an idea for helping the context (and google searches) that forces all to suffer (all suffering is the core of compromise? <VBG>) VTAM USS or zOS USS context is clear and google searches return the correct information. viva la evolution! <VBG> Where is Amy Farrah Fowler when we need her? I am sure Sheldon would agree that USS would only have one use determined by him. I expect that this argument will go on for the next 20 or 30 years. After which USS will be ceded to Unix System Services as a "no-prize" (marvel reference) due to lack of opposition and the fact that no one will care anymore. Rob Schramm On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < [email protected]> wrote: > In <[email protected]>, on 05/02/2011 > at 07:49 PM, Itschak Mugzach <[email protected]> said: > > >Everybodu uses USS for Unix System Services, > > No. > > >including IBM. > > John Eels is from IBM. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Rob Schramm Senior Systems Engineer w: 513.305.6224 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
