________________________________
From: Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 1:32:56 AM
Subject: Re: assembler batch calling unix daemon

Michael,
I dare to comment on your "vast overhead of creating an ASID".
While I agree that creating an address space in not a cheap thing
in z/OS, it is by far not as often needed as your statement might
imply. Only if there is no idle BPXAS UNIX services initiator 
available, is it that a new address space has to be built.



Peter:

Interesting comment. About 25 years ago I was talking with an IBM SE out in our 
NY office. She was proposing that we go IMS out there (I was surprised as they 
really didn't need it IMO). I asked her about address creation as she was going 
with the then IMS concept of every transaction was going to a new ASID. Ishook 
my head and said to her that I thought ASID creation would be a killer in 
overhead. She assured me it wasn't all that bad. I am not an IMS person for 
sure 
but it sounded a little bit off but I could not challenge her on my knowledge 
of 
IMS just on ASID creation. I asked her to double check with her sources as (at 
least then) ASID creation was costly. She was self assured that it was minor. I 
got a hold of some IBM people I knew from GUIDE and they suggested that she 
read 
some manual (Long time forgotten) and I did. She backed down on the idea 
though. 
They never went IMS so it was a mute point. 

Ed

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to