In <[email protected]>, on 04/12/2011
at 10:22 PM, "R.S." <[email protected]> said:
>So, IBM simply closed way for "independent vendor" blades.
No.
>What does it mean???
Management covers a multitude of sins.
>Yes, centralized management could be a value added, but it's NOT
>crucial for the application.
Lots of things are not crucial for the application but still add
enough value to be worth the expense.
>Couldn't ISAO live without such management?
Il va sans dire. But that's not the relevant question.
>I strongly doubt.
No doubt, but that conveys no information.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
