On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:38 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote: >This is an old recurring problem. Ditto for DD statement restrictions. > >I recall early in my career with IBM we had a homegrown job scheduler >which required that every DDNAME be unique because effectively it was >a single step job that controlled all "pseudo" steps in the job. > Errr... SYSIN? SYSPRINT? SYSUT1? STEPLIB? ...
I'm baffled. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
