[email protected] (Bill Fairchild) writes: > It was. ECKD was announced in the early- to mid-80s, which was 25+ > years ago, which is several decades ago. Not all users respond > quickly.
as expected ... they were using "eckd" ... and just not bothering to fully qualify ... since the transition occured so many decades ago ... it possibly appeared superfluous at this point for the distinction (unless in legacy discussion that specifically is about differences). past posts in thread: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011e.html#31 "Social Security Confronts IT Obsolescence" http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011e.html#35 junking CKD; was "Social Security Confronts IT Obsolescence" http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011e.html#37 junking CKD; was "Social Security Confronts IT Obsolescence" http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011e.html#43 junking CKD; was "Social Security Confronts IT Obsolescence" http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011e.html#44 junking CKD; was "Social Security Confronts IT Obsolescence" http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011e.html#45 junking CKD; was "Social Security Confronts IT Obsolescence" -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
