>Prior IBM's withdrawal of the sunset date, I had submitted many specific >complaints to the SR help desk. Some were bugs, some were performance >issues, some were (IMO) poor design choices, etc. > >I have more issues, but I've run out of time to provide IBM clear >understandable specific complaints; so I ranted here. I apologize. When I >get more time, I will resume sending appropriate complaints to IBM.
Don't worry, IBM does get the SR complaints voiced here. They just don't act on it! After my last complaint in December about SR, they apporached me to get 'more opinion'. If they can't figure the facts from those I provided in that post, it is hopeless! Given that that application has been coded by clickers, they have no clue (and probably didn't even look at ETR) how to design things with our platform in mind, too. And to put insult to injury, they make the same mistakes in design choices as those did that developed the PC front end for retain in the late nineties (back when I was IBM) that was forced upon level1 and 2. I tested that PC front end then, gave feedback and went back to the much more user-friendly retain! As did all those that can remember the retain commands. I obviously don't know who uses what today. Barbara Nitz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
