In <[email protected]>, on 03/06/2011
   at 04:15 PM, john gilmore <[email protected]> said:

>This is not the case.

Not only is it the case, it has been for decades.

>Worse, he has been admonished about this error repeatedly.

Before you admonish him again, RYFM.

>The Inquisition would almost certainly labelled him as not just a
>heretic but an obdurate one,

Putting him on the side of the angels.

>AS I and others have already noted that the question whether a
>PDS[E] member named <member> exists is 1) moot until the question
>whether that PDS[E] itself exists is resolved and 2) 

Is highly relevant to what happens if the PDS does exists, both in
practice and according to the SRL.

>DISP=MOD goes back to OS/PCP.

ITYM OS/360.

>something like

The Devil is in the details. "Something like" doesn't cut it. An
actual quote would be more relevant, e.g., 

   12.23.7  Disposition of Partitioned Data Sets (PDSs and PDSEs)

     When you specify DISP=MOD or DISP=NEW for a partitioned data
     set (PDS) or partitioned data set extended (PDSE), and you
     also specify a member name in the DSNAME parameter, the
     member name must not already exist.  If the member name
     already exists, the system terminates the job.

     When you specify DISP=OLD for a PDS or a PDSE, and you also
     specify a member name in the DSNAME parameter, the data set
     must already exist.  If the member name already exists and
     the data set is opened for output, the system replaces the
     existing member with the new member.  If the member name does
     not already exist and the data set is opened for output, the
     system adds the member to the data set.

Admittedly early versions of the documentation were sketchy, but
that's been fixed for lo these many years. Also, the quoted text is
admittedly wrong if you OPEN with DSORG and do your own STOW.

>and what anyway is all of this pother about?

Perhaps the OP prefers that his code work correctly?

 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to