Chris, I would only recommend to the others on the list that non-engagement is probably the only successful strategy. And to leave you to your opinion of USS. I would additionally ask that when you experience any outrage about USS uses, that you would channel the outrage into a new post.
I do appreciate you finally starting your own thread. I have gone out to read some of your posts regarding a variety of subjects. While being a bit brittle at times, your posts did seem to indicate that you do possess a good handle on Communication Server issues. I can only say that you have not dissuaded me one bit from my current use of USS. I have the following "take aways": 1) Information regarding a "dirty look" from a person deeply ensconced in VTAM-speak when I use USS for Unix System Services. 2) You have inspired me to act rather than just disagree with you ad nauseum and to take a page from Dilbert. I encourage everyone that considers USS to be Unix System Services to write [email protected] requesting the modification of the USS acronym definition. I have sent my first e-mail requesting the change, and I plan to encourage all System Programmers that USS should be changed in the official IBM Terminology page. Cheers, Rob Schramm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
