At 11:59 -0600 on 12/01/2010, Dana Mitchell wrote about Re: spool to
spool output transfer:
> would take JES2 -> JESA -> JESB -> JES2
Interesting puzzle. Seems to me that still wouldn't work, since JESA wouldÂ
need to know about JES2 (left) because it's connected to it, and JES2
(right) in order to know it needs to route traffic destined for
JES2 (right) via
JESB.
Dana
It is doable.
All 4 Nodes have
N1 JES2
N255 JESB
N254 JESA
CONNECT NODE1=JESA,NODE2=JESB
CONNECT NODE1=JESA,NODE2=JES2
Note that the CONNECT statement does not pass connection information
between nodes. Also the JES2 in JESA is JES2 Left while the JES2 in
JESB is JES2 Right.
On JES2 Left you route the data to N255 (which passes it through
JESA's JESA<->JESB connection) via a ROUTE NODE=N255 command (I
forget the syntax). On JESB, you have a timed $TA that does the route
of N255 to N1 (passing it the rest of the way).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
