>I actually took Hal's comment the other way, that the "not very far from the >actuality" was referring back to the meaningless indicator. >In that case, it >really is pretty accurate. >IOW, MIPS is meaningless.
Because of: >>In fairness, it -is- a number that a high manager can use to reasonbly >>quantify things. I took it the other way. The poster appeared to believe it was a meaningful measurement. - Ted MacNEIL [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
