Ravi

Maybe you should tune your Google skills!

I tried "inet_addr failed, cannot convert address" and - after a few hits where 
the partially sighted were leading the less ocularly fortunate a merry 
pointless 
dance - I found the following:

http://support.sas.com/kb/3/540.html

<quote>

The following messages may be displayed when using the TCP communications 
access method:

  ERROR: Unable to initialize the TCP/IP Subsystem.
  ERROR: inet_addr failed, cannot convert address '';

These errors are likely to occur when the TCP/IP HOSTS file does not contain 
an entry for "localhost".  For example, on Windows and Unix systems the 
HOSTS file would contain an entry similar to the following:

  127.0.0.1    localhost

On MVS and OS/390 systems, these messages may occur if SAS is unable to 
locate the TCPIP.ETC.SERVICES file.  A possible solution is to allocate the 
TCPDATA file with a DDname of SYSTCPD.  For example,

  ALLOC F(SYSTCPD) DA(prefix.SYS1.PARMS(TCPDATA))

</quote>

Doesn't that solution bear an uncanny resemblance to what I managed to 
deduce?

Unfortunately, the folk responsible for this information, while they may know 
Windows and UNIX well enough, are a bit "at sea" when it comes to the IP 
component of z/OS Communications Server.

The problem is not related to the xxx.ETC.SERVICES file or not being able to 
access that file is just one of the ways you could get similar problems and far 
less likely than the missing "localhost" entry and the proposed solution is 
quite 
unrelated to the supposed problem.

-

If you are confused over how to solve your problem, please post the following:

1. If you believe you use a name server, mention the response of your 
colleagues responsible for your name server when you ask whether or not they 
resolve "localhost" to 127.0.0.1

2. Post the contents of your resolver procedure - if you have one

3. If you have a resolver procedure, post the contents of the resolver setup 
file

4. Post the contents of the generically named TCPIP.DATA file which applies 
to this SASMSTR procedure

As you did before, you can "blank out" any identifying information with X's.

If you are not familiar with the above points, get help from whomever in your 
organisation is responsible for the IP component of z/OS Communications 
Server.

Based on the answers, I/we can advise how to deal with the problem of the 
missing "localhost" to "127.0.0.1" mapping.

Incidentally, you might like to have a look into your "hosts" file on your PC. 
On 
this PC the file is found as 

C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts

You will very probably see - fanfare! - that, apart from comments, the only 
entry is the following:

127.0.0.1       localhost

Another incidentally: while searching I noticed you have had this problem 
since at least the end of August!

Chris Mason


On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:21:52 -0600, Ravi Kumar 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Before I talk to SAS thought to cross post here..
>
>I am exploiting mailing service using SAS however on particular lpar only
>it seems to be not working ..below is my JCL.
>
>//SENDMAIL  EXEC SASMSTR,
>// OPTIONS='EMAILSYS=SMTP EMAILHOST=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'
>//SYSIN  DD  *
> Filename emp email
> From='[email protected]'
> To='[email protected]'
> Subject='TEST'
> Attach ='xxxxx.TEMPFTP.TEXT';
> Data _Null_         ;
> File emp;
> put   ;
> run;
>
>I have checked the SMTP Mailer address in SMTP Config
>EZA5348I IP Mailer Address              : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx  ==same as used
>in job.
>
>I get below error :-
>
>ERROR: Unable to connect to SMTP server.
>ERROR: Unable to connect to SMTP server.
>ERROR: Unable to connect to SMTP server.
>ERROR: inet_addr failed, cannot convert address 'LOCALHOST'.
>ERROR: inet_addr failed, cannot convert address 'LOCALHOST'.
>ERROR: inet_addr failed, cannot convert address 'LOCALHOST'.
>
>
>Now not able to crack it down to find why it's not able to resolve the SMTP
>mailing server address...
>
>One of the diagnostic step I took was to start the packet trace on address
>= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and port 25(smtp) however seems my job when ran could 
not
>even hit this hence nothing was captured in the Packet tracing...
>
>Does anyone has any kind of thought or ideas to crack it down ...Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>Note ** I have searched in archive and also cross post to tcp forum ** also
>did google however when listed doesn't match with solution for me **
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to