On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:56:15 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module. >> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by >> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by >> make for the whole build.) >> >> These data files should move to the module they belong to. The are, after >> all, "source code" for that module that is "compiler" into resulting >> deliverables, for that module. (But the "source code" language is not Java >> or C, but typically a highly domain specific language or data format, and >> the "compilation" is, often, a specialized transformation.) >> >> This misplacement of the data directory is most visible at code review time. >> When such data is changed, most of the time build-dev (or the new build >> label) is involved, even though this has nothing to do with the build. While >> this is annoying, a worse problem is if the actual team that needs to review >> the patch (i.e., the team owning the module) is missed in the review. >> >> ### Modules reviewed >> >> - [x] java.base >> - [ ] java.desktop >> - [x] jdk.compiler >> - [x] java.se > > Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request with a new target base due to > a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Update comment refering to "make" dir > - Move new symbols to jdk.compiler > - Merge branch 'master' into shuffle-data > - Move macosxicons from share to macosx > - Move to share/data, and move jdwp.spec to java.se > - Update references in test > - Step 2: Update references > - First stage, move actual data files Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer). ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1611
