Looks OK to me,
-- Jon
On 08/29/2017 05:26 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi,
Please review this very small fix to javadoc for this issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179246
Here is the proposed fix:
diff -r 0bc7e9acd67b
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/AbstractResourceBundleProvider.java
---
a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/AbstractResourceBundleProvider.java
+++
b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/AbstractResourceBundleProvider.java
@@ -137,9 +137,10 @@
*
* <p>For example, if {@code baseName} is {@code
"p.resources.Bundle"} then
* the resource bundle name of {@code "p.resources.Bundle"} of
- * {@code Locale("ja", "", "XX")} and {@code Locale("en")}
- * could be {@code "p.resources.ja.Bundle_ja_ _XX"} and
- * {@code p.resources.Bundle_en"} respectively
+ * <code style="white-space:nowrap">Locale("ja", "", "XX")</code>
+ * and {@code Locale("en")} could be <code
style="white-space:nowrap">
+ * "p.resources.ja.Bundle_ja_ _XX"</code> and
+ * {@code "p.resources.Bundle_en"} respectively.
*
* <p> This method is called from the default implementation of the
* {@link #getBundle(String, Locale)} method.
Naoto