Looks OK to me,

-- Jon

On 08/29/2017 05:26 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi,

Please review this very small fix to javadoc for this issue:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179246

Here is the proposed fix:

diff -r 0bc7e9acd67b src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/AbstractResourceBundleProvider.java --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/AbstractResourceBundleProvider.java +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/AbstractResourceBundleProvider.java
@@ -137,9 +137,10 @@
      *
* <p>For example, if {@code baseName} is {@code "p.resources.Bundle"} then
      * the resource bundle name of {@code "p.resources.Bundle"} of
-     * {@code Locale("ja",&nbsp;"",&nbsp;"XX")} and {@code Locale("en")}
-     * could be {@code "p.resources.ja.Bundle_ja_&thinsp;_XX"} and
-     * {@code p.resources.Bundle_en"} respectively
+     * <code style="white-space:nowrap">Locale("ja", "", "XX")</code>
+ * and {@code Locale("en")} could be <code style="white-space:nowrap">
+     * "p.resources.ja.Bundle_ja_&thinsp;_XX"</code> and
+     * {@code "p.resources.Bundle_en"} respectively.
      *
      * <p> This method is called from the default implementation of the
      * {@link #getBundle(String, Locale)} method.


Naoto

Reply via email to