Please get a reviewer to review the JDK7u changes.
Approved but subject to review.
regards,
Sean.
On 12/09/14 15:42, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hello,
Could you, please, approve a backport of tz2014g related changes to
JDK7. The backport is not straight-forward one, there is no generic
time zone names in JDK7 - because of that the tz names changes
slightly differs from JDK8.
Also, there was a temporary fix for JSR310 code and test failures in
JDK8/9. This changes wasn't applied too - they are not relevant to JDK7.
Because of such differences, I assume that its also a subject for
review too (adding i18n-dev alias),
Performed testing:
JPRT testing: No tz related failures were observed in
(jdk_util,jdk_other,jdk_text)
JTREG testing: test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone test/sun/util/calendar
test/closed/java/util/TimeZone test/java/util/TimeZone
test/java/util/Calendar
test/java/util/Formatter test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone
test/closed/java/text/Format/DateFormat
Thank you,
Aleksej
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8049343/7/webrev.00/
JDK9 review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-September/028467.html
JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f7de7da2eb58
JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049343
