Thank you for the review, Stuart.
I just wanted to get rid of "Control" in front of "FORMAT_DEFAULT", but
silly me, I did not do that! And it does not seem to make much sense
using static import just for that purpose. I will remove "static" from
the proposed fix.
Naoto
On 11/6/13 4:11 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi Naoto,
The changes look sensible, though I'm not an expert in the
ResourceBundle API.
I did notice though that in ResourceBundleTest.java there is a static
import of java.util.ResourceBundle.Control. Does it need to be a static
import? Surprisingly, it seems to compile either way.
s'marks
On 11/6/13 2:36 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
And here is the proposed webrev. Please review:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8027930/webrev.00/
Naoto
On 11/6/13 9:47 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Thank you, Francis. I created the following CR for those ResourceBundle
test failures:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027930
Naoto
On 11/5/13 10:31 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote:
HI
To add a little bit more of clarity for the i18n problems in the
ResourceBundle tests, joined is an extract from the log of their
failures before I fixed them for the non US Locale case. Sorry for not
having joined this log before.
HTH
Francis
