Hi Masayoshi,
At that time I was asked to have regression test to validate each
translation changes.
With our new translation process for TimeZoneNames and new planned
regression tests from Aleksej for JDK-8025051
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025051>, I believe we can
remove those unnecessary tests in the future (probably together with
JDK-8025051 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025051>).
For now, webrev [2] looks fine to take care of the short term
regression failure.
thanks,
-michael
On 13?10?22? 09:29 ??, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Hi Michael,
27 *@summary Test case for tzdata2005m support for 9 locales
What's the purpose of this test? Do we really need to keep this one?
Thanks,
Masayoshi
On 10/22/2013 8:13 PM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hi,
Can I have a review for 8026772 [1] fix.
The webrev link: [2]
The timezone test is failed because of the changed TimeZone names
introduced in 8025255 [3].
This timezone names were changed according to updated translation
resource files introduced by 8025215 [4].
The fix changes the hard-coded time zone names for "Australia/Currie"
to the values specified in 8025215.
Thanks in Advance,
Aleksej
[1] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8026772
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8026772/webrev.00/
[3] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8025255
[4] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8025215
