Sherman,

thanks for your additional explanation.

One nit more...
Why you use the "sun." prefix? I think,
    "stdout.encoding"
    "stderr.encoding"
would be enough + nicer. In some years, nobody will have any association with 
'sun'.
On the other hand, it would be more true to use:
    "windows.stdout.encoding"
    "windows.stderr.encoding"

-Ulf


Am 14.02.2012 00:02, schrieb Xueming Shen:

To have separate sun.stdout.encoding and sun.stderr.encoding is mainly because 
of implementation
convenience. I need three things from the native (1) is std.out tty (2) is std.err tty (3) the console
encoding if (1) or (2) are true, and I tried to avoid to go down to native 
multiple times it appears
passing back two encoding name is the easiest approach. The original plan was 
to remove them after
use, maybe via sun.misc.VM.saveAndRemoveProperties() (or simply remove them 
directly), but then
thought the info might be useful...

Auto detect the encoding of InputStreamReader when it is attached the console 
is nice to have, but
I would try to avoid doing that until I have to, before that I would still advise the use of java.io.Console
class:-)

-Sherman


Why are there theoretically different code pages for stdout and stderr?

you can re-direct std err to a log file file but keep the std out to the 
console, or re-direct
the std out but keep the std.err to the console, in these scenario, the stderr 
and stdout
will use different code page. Basically the approach is that if the otuput 
stream gets
re-directed, it keeps using the default charset (with the assumption that the 
rest of the
world is using the Windows codepage), if not, use the oem codepage from the 
console
on Windows, to make sure the System.out/err outputs the bits that the underlying
console can understand.
Oops, I'm not sure, if you didn't misunderstood me.
I mean, why are there 2 different properties? :
    "sun.stdout.encoding"
    "sun.stderr.encoding"
Shouldn't something be enough like
    "console.encoding"
as counterpart to
     "file.encoding"
?

-Ulf


Reply via email to