Xueming Shen wrote:
:

UNICODE_CHARACTER_CLASS is clear and straightforward. I am OK with it.

The webrev, ccc and api docs have been updated accordingly.

Yes, I still need a reviewer for the implementation changes. Tom has helped review
the doc (and the definition of those properties).
I've gone through the implementation changes. Looks good and I didn't see anything obviously wrong. A couple of minor comments:

In UnicodeProp.forName it might be more efficient to eliminate the containsKey and instead check whether get returns null. Also, should this only be ignoring IAE rather than Exception?

In Pattern.java L912 I guess you didn't mean to change "string" to "stringg". Another one at L1317 - "if UNICODE_CHARACTER_CLASS presents" - I assume this should be "present".

You might want to check the headers on the new tests - looks like you've included the header that has the classpath exception, also they claim to have been written years ago. UnicodeProp is also confused about its birthdate.

-Alan


Reply via email to