2010/1/8 Masayoshi Okutsu <masayoshi.oku...@sun.com>: > Thank you for providing the test case. The webrev looks good to me. > >> Is it ok to push this to OpenJDK6 (swing forest as used for i18n)? >> > > Do you mean OpenJDK7? If so, yes, we use the swing forest for i18n. > > Thanks, > Masayoshi > > On 1/8/2010 2:13 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> >> Bug 6584033 actually fixes two issues, the second relating to the >> interaction between the timezone setting, the security manager and >> signed jars: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=381 >> >> It was fixed in OpenJDK7 b22, but there is no testcase to ensure this >> doesn't regress. Mark Wielaard provided one and this has since been >> approved for OpenJDK6 by Joe Darcy (along with the backported fix): >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2009-December/001036.html >> >> Here's a webrev of the test as applied to OpenJDK6: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6584033/webrev.01/ >> >> Is it ok to push this to OpenJDK6 (swing forest as used for i18n)? >> >> Thanks, >> >
Yes, sorry for the typo and thanks for the review. Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/swing/jdk/rev/e9ccd1dd6923 -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8