*Delhi Violence: Genesis of Carnage*

*Ram Puniyani*



They say ‘history repeats itself first as a tragedy and then as a farce’.
In case of India, communal violence not only keeps repeating itself, the
pattern of the tragedy keeps changing every next time. Some features of the
violence are constant, but they are under the wraps mostly. The same can be
said about the Delhi violence (February 2020). The interpretations, the
causative factors are very discernible, but those who are generally the
perpetrators have a knack of shifting the blame on the victim community or
those who stand for the victims.

As the carnage began presumably in the aftermath of statement of Kapil
Mishra
<https://www.sabrangindia.in/article/delhi-violence-kapil-mishra-villain-story>
of BJP, which was given in front of a top police official, in which he
threatened to get the roads emptied. The roots of violence were sown
earlier. The interpretations given by the Hindu Nationalist camp is that
the riot is due to the changing
<https://theprint.in/politics/rss-sees-larger-design-in-delhi-communal-riots-blames-changing-demographic-profile/372552/>
demographic profile of the area with Muslims increasing in number in those
areas, and coming up of Shaheen Bagh which was presented was like ‘Mini
Pakistan’. As per them the policies of BJP in matters of triple talaq,
Article 370 and CAA, NPR, NRC has unnerved the ‘radical’ elements and so
this violence.

As such before coming to the observations of the activists and scholars of
communal violence in India, we can in brief say that violence, in which
nearly 46 people have died, include one from police and another from
intelligence. Majority victims are Muslims. The violence started right
under the nose of the police and the ruling party. From the videos and
other eye accounts, police not only looked the other way around, at places
it assisted those attacking the innocent victims and burning and looting
selective shops. Home minister, Amit Shah, was nowhere on the scene. For
first three days the rioters had free run. After the paramilitary force was
brought in; the violence simmered and slowly reduced in intensity. The
state AAP Government, which in a way is the byproduct of RSS supported Anna
Hazare movement, was busy reading Hanuman Chalisa and praying at Rajghat
with eyes closed to the mayhem going in parts of Delhi.

Communal violence is the sore point of Indian society. It did begin during
colonial period due to British policy of ‘Divide and Rule’. At root cause
was the communal view of looking at history and pro active British acts to
sow the seeds of Hindu-Muslim divide. At other level the administrative and
police the British were fairly neutral. On one hand was the national
movement, uniting the people and creating and strengthening the fraternal
feeling among all Indians. On the other were Muslim Communalists (Muslim
League) and Hindu Communalists (Hindu Mahasabha, RSS) who assisted the
British goal of ‘divide and rule’ promoting hatred between the communities.
After partition the first major change was the change in attitude of police
and administration which started tilting against Muslims. Major studies by
Dr. Asghar Ali Engineer
<https://theprint.in/politics/rss-sees-larger-design-in-delhi-communal-riots-blames-changing-demographic-profile/372552/>,
Paul Brass and Omar Khalidi demonstrated that anti Muslim bias is
discernible in during and after the riots.

Now the partisan role of police has been visible all through. Sri Krishna
Commission report brought forth this fact; as did the research of the Ex
DIG of UP police Dr. V.N.Rai. Dr. Rai’s studies
<http://www.sacw.net/article5161.html> also concluded that no communal
violence can go on beyond 24 hours unless state administration is complicit
in the carnage. In one of the violence, investigation of which was done by
concerned Citizen’s team (Dhule, 2013) this author observed that police
itself went on to undertake the rampage
<https://www.countercurrents.org/puniyani310113.htm> against Muslims and
Muslim properties.

General observation about riots is that violence sounds to be spontaneous,
as the Home Minister is pointing out, but as such it is well planned act.
Again the violence is orchestrated in such a way that it seems Muslims have
begun the riots. Who casts the First stone? To this scholars
<https://www.thehindu.com/books/books-reviews/everyday-communalism-riots-in-contemporary-uttar-pradesh-review-not-a-spontaneous-outburst/article23699623.ece>
point out that the carnage is so organized that the encircled community is
forced to throw the first stone. At places the pretext is made that ‘they’
(minorities) have thrown the first stone.

The pretexts against minorities are propagated, in Gujarat violence Godhra
train burning, in Kandhamal the murder of Swami Laxamannand and now Shaheen
bagh! The Hindu Muslim violence began as riots. But it is no more a riot,
two sides are not involved. It is plain and simple anti Minority violence,
in which some from the majority are also the victims.

This violence is possible as the ‘Hate against this minority’ is now more
or less structural. The deeper Hate against Muslims and partly against
Christians; has been cultivated since long and Hindu nationalist politics,
right from its Shakhas to the social media have been put to use for
spreading Hatred. The prevalent deeper hate has been supplanted this time
by multiple utterances from BJP leaders, Modi (Can be recognized by
clothes), Shah (press EVM machine button so hard that current is felt in
Shaheen Bagh), Anurag Thakur (Goli (bullet) Maro) Yogi Aditya Nath (If Boli
(Words)Do not work Goli will) and Parvesh Varma (They will be out to rape).

The incidental observation of the whole tragedy is the coming to surface of
true colors of AAP, which not only kept mum as the carnage was peaking but
also went on to praise the role of police in the whole episode. With Delhi
carnage “Goli Maro” seems to be becoming the central slogan of Hindu
nationalists. Delhi’s this violence has been the first one in which those
getting killed are more due to bullets than by swords or knifes! Leader’s
slogans do not go in vain! Courts the protectors of our Constitution seem
to be of little help as if one of them like Murlidhar Rao gives the verdict
to file against hate mongers, he is immediately transferred.

And lastly let’s recall the academic study of Yale University. It
concludes; BJP gains
<https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-gains-in-polls-after-every-riot-says-yale-study/articleshow/45378840.cms>
in electoral strength after every riot’. In India the grip of communalism
is increasing frighteningly. Efforts are needed to combat Hate and Hate
mongers.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/humanrights-movement/CAKa3rYGbFVSpNBdwKDKoW0pESDaNVA%2B6GntsBOzZ9O8outaLqQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to