YOUR GOVERNMENT WANTS REVENGE FROM YOU
<https://kafila.online/2019/12/29/your-government-wants-revenge-from-you/>
Uttar Pradesh is dealing with CAA as it dealt with crime: encounters.
Subhash Gatade <https://www.newsclick.in/author/Subhash%20Gatade>

29 Dec 2019 (
https://www.newsclick.in/your-government-wants-revenge-you)
[image: Uttar Pradesh is dealing with CAA as it dealt with crime]
<https://www.newsclick.in/sites/default/files/2019-12/nrc%2088.png>
Image Courtesy: PTI

Seventy-six year old advocate Mohammad Shoaib fought to have innocents branded
as terrorists <https://www.countercurrents.org/gatade090508.htm> under
repressive laws released, and risked multiple assaults by right-wing
lawyers as he took these cases through various courts in Uttar Pradesh. His
contemporary, former police officer SR Darapuri became a human rights
activist <https://countercurrents.org/author/sr-darapuri> and writer after
he retired. Neither would have imagined one day they would be lodged in
jail, charged with rioting and creating disaffection, under similarly
draconian laws.

But as everybody knows, in Uttar Pradesh today Shoaib and Darapuri are not
exceptions. They are just two notable figures among the hundreds of
socio-political activists, writers and cultural workers—not to forget
ordinary folks—who have been packed into various state prisons for opposing
the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens
(NRC). These protests are going on across the country, and started peaking
after 19 December, when students spontaneously poured out in the streets
against the new law and the proposed policy.

Uttar Pradesh’s administration has come down on those protesting with a
heavy hand. The Chief Minister, Yogi Adityanath, tried to project the
opposition to the bill as a purely ‘law and order issue: therefore, he
sought to justify seeking “revenge
<https://www.newsclick.in/government-out-take-revenge-its-people>” against
those who damaged public or private property.

A fine example of how the vendetta is unfolding in the northern state is in
Varanasi. Here, one of the FIRs lodged by the police names 56 people,
including leading social activists, labour leaders and more than twenty
students of Banaras Hindu University. They have been collectively charged
<https://www.mediavigil.com/news/varanasi-56-people-booked-under-eight-sections-of-ipc-anti-caa-protests/)>
under
eight sections of the Indian Penal Code. The arrest of an activist couple,
Ekta Shekhar and Ravi, who work on environmental issues, has become
symptomatic of the callousness of the law and order machinery. They have
been denied a visit by their 14-month-old daughter.

The question arises whether the burden of law and order rests only on the
ordinary people or does it also apply to the supposed upholders of this law
and order as well?

For instance, no question is raised about miscreants in civil dress
who had covered
their faces <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhJrghhmN8Y>, engaged in arson
and even attacked anti-CAA protesters while the police turned a blind eye.

In many instances, the police have leveled serious charges against people
when not even a semblance of violence
<https://scroll.in/article/947814/shock-in-varanasi-as-56-social-activists-charged-with-violent-rioting-after-a-peaceful-protest>
had
occurred. The arrest of activist Deepak Kabir, who was apprehended inside
the police station where he had gone to look for
<https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/brutalised-for-looking-up-friends/cid/1729833?ref=search-page>
his
<https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/brutalised-for-looking-up-friends/cid/1729833?ref=search-page>missing
friends
<https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/brutalised-for-looking-up-friends/cid/1729833?ref=search-page>
made
national headlines, but his is not the sole such instance either.

Reports tell us that the police did not even spare thirteen-year-olds.
Children from Bijnor have shared harrowing accounts
<https://thewire.in/communalism/in-bijnor-children-give-harrowing-accounts-of-beating-by-up-police-after-caa-protest>
of
how the police beat them after CAA protests. They said they were “tortured
over a period of 48 hours” before they were released. The police, they
said, wanted to teach
<https://www.huffingtonpost.in/amp/entry/caa-uttar-pradesh-police-tortured-children_in_5e0207b5e4b05b08babab722>them
a lesson
<https://www.huffingtonpost.in/amp/entry/caa-uttar-pradesh-police-tortured-children_in_5e0207b5e4b05b08babab722>
.

Videos on social media, and some which have featured on the mainstream TV
channels, strongly suggest that the police provoked people into getting
violent, by using high-handed tactics. Recall that a leading channel had
revealed policemen, deliberately and without apparent provocation, had
destroyed
<https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/police-use-tear-gas-lathi-charge-at-aligarh-muslim-university-afters-protest-against-crackdown-in-ja-2149300,%20https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/cctv-videos-counter-up-police-stand-on-aligarh-university-crackdown-2151013>
motorcycles
<https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/police-use-tear-gas-lathi-charge-at-aligarh-muslim-university-afters-protest-against-crackdown-in-ja-2149300,%20https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/cctv-videos-counter-up-police-stand-on-aligarh-university-crackdown-2151013>
at
the gate of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU). This was right before AMU
students and the university premises came under attack
<https://www.newsclick.in/amu-police-brutality-brings-aligarhs-muslims-hindus-closer>
from
the police.

Police personnel have also been found to be allegedly entering houses of
people, especially of the Muslims, after first breaking CCTV cameras to
destroy any evidence of their wrongdoings. They have been accused of
<https://www.newsclick.in/ill-give-away-my-property-if-police-gives-evidence-my-son-damaging-public-property>creating
mayhem
<https://www.newsclick.in/ill-give-away-my-property-if-police-gives-evidence-my-son-damaging-public-property>
and
even looting
<https://www.newsclick.in/muzaffarnagar-residents-narrate-horror-stories-police-excesses>
homes.
It is a marker of the deteriorating situation in the state that a
newspaper, which always maintained a moderate image, has questioned the
“in-your-face brazenness of the Uttar Pradesh law enforcement machinery” in
dealing with anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act protesters.

According to it
<https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/brazenness-on-display-16594>, “In trying
to project a harsh, no-nonsense approach for maintaining order on the
streets, the message the Yogi Adityanath government has managed to send
across inadvertently or intentionally does not camouflage communal
overtones: ‘don’t you dare (protest)’... Probing questions are going
unanswered on selective targeting of protesters, amid widespread charges of
police brutality across the state.

National Human Rights Commission has also issued a notice
<https://thewire.in/government/nhrc-issues-notice-to-up-dgp-over-police-action-during-anti-caa-protests>
to
the UP Director-General of Police over their actions taken during the
anti-CAA protests. The NHRC had been receiving petitions seeking its
intervention in the alleged incidents of violation of human rights by the
state police.

A fact-finding team of rights activists comprising Yogendra Yadav, Kavita
Krishnan and Riad Azam recently toured parts of UP. In their report they
say that the Yogi Adityanath government has unleashed a “reign of terror”
in Uttar Pradesh. The report
<https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/report-finds-reign-of-terror-by-yogi-adityanath-cops/cid/1730523?ref=india_india-page>
released
by them cites district-wise statistics and testimonies from families, and
accuses the state’s Bharatiya Janata Party government of brazenly targeting
Muslims and social activists.

Their report says that developments in the state demand a special
investigation under the supervision of the Supreme Court and also that the
police officers accused of atrocities must be suspended so that the real
guilty can be identified.

The question is, why has Uttar Pradesh witnessed the most violence and
deaths (at least 20 people have died) in the anti-CAA protests and why does
UP also stand out for making the most arrests? In UP, the police have
booked 21,500 people in 15 FIRs in just Kanpur
<https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/21-500-booked-for-violence-in-kanpur-1631048-2019-12-24>
and
it has filed an FIR against 1,200 AMU students for simply holding
<https://www.timesnownews.com/india/article/fir-against-1200-amu-students-for-carrying-out-candlelight-march/531659>a
candlelight march
<https://www.timesnownews.com/india/article/fir-against-1200-amu-students-for-carrying-out-candlelight-march/531659>,
which did not see any violence.

“The property of each element involved in this violence will be
confiscated, and used to recover compensation for public property which was
damaged. All their faces have been identified. They are visible in the
videograph and CCTV footage. We will take revenge
<https://www.newsclick.in/yogi-adityanath-takes-revenge> by confiscating
their properties, I have ordered strict action.”

The free hand given by the Yogi government
<https://www.newsclick.in/CAA-NRC-magsaysay-awardee-flays-UP-police-vengeance-protesters>
to
the police to go all out to “curb crime” using fake encounters has
encouraged an atmosphere of impunity in the forces. In the first 16 months
of Yogi government officially there were 3,026 police encounters, in which
69 criminals were gunned down, which the government highlighted as an “
achievement
<https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/republic-day-yogi-adityanath-highlights-3-000-encounters-as-govt-achievement-1439106-2019-01-25>
”.

Now the government has put up “w
<https://inshorts.com/en/news/up-police-issues-wanted-posters-of-anticaa-rioters-in-meerut-1577095578235>
anted
<https://inshorts.com/en/news/up-police-issues-wanted-posters-of-anticaa-rioters-in-meerut-1577095578235>”
posters of ordinary people who participated in the protests, declared them
“rioters” and asked people to report their behaviour in exchange for a
suitable reward. It also wants to seiz
<https://scroll.in/article/947844/notices-to-recover-damages-from-protestors-in-uttar-pradesh-based-on-flawed-high-court-order>
e
<https://scroll.in/article/947844/notices-to-recover-damages-from-protestors-in-uttar-pradesh-based-on-flawed-high-court-order>

<https://scroll.in/article/947844/notices-to-recover-damages-from-protestors-in-uttar-pradesh-based-on-flawed-high-court-order>
the
<https://scroll.in/article/947844/notices-to-recover-damages-from-protestors-in-uttar-pradesh-based-on-flawed-high-court-order>
properties
<https://scroll.in/article/947844/notices-to-recover-damages-from-protestors-in-uttar-pradesh-based-on-flawed-high-court-order>
of
protesters, apparently because they engaged in violence and destruction of
property. The process of attachment of properties has already begun. “In
Muzaffarnagar, around three dozen shops have been sealed with the intention
of recovering the loss of public property by selling the goods stored in
these shops and shops themselves if needed. In Kanpur, 28 persons have been
identified as the perpetrators,” this report
<https://www.sabrangindia.in/article/seizure-properties-who-paid-destruction-property-gujarat-violence-2002>
says.
The administration of Rampur has similarly issued notices to 28 people it
has “identified for violence” during last week’s protests.

The basic idea of judicial oversight has been overlooked in issuing these
orders, but the real game plan is apparent. The UP government wants to
criminalise and terrorise any protest. Whether this unholy alliance of a
section of the law and order machinery with right-wing miscreants, lasts
will determine the future of this democracy. Would this be allowed to
succeed or would it be challenged with all our might is the big question.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/humanrights-movement/CAJGPqcbO95g7w%2B5JrD%3DJzw1bn%2BLEW7Lg-nceiSvDQ_aXFWzv9Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to