Democracy as Majoritarianism
Written by Subhash Gatade
<https://www.sabrangindia.in/articles/subhash%20gatade> | Published on: April
30, 2019
facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://www.sabrangindia.in/article/democracy-majoritarianism&display=popup&ref=plugin>
twitter
<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=https://www.sabrangindia.in/article/democracy-majoritarianism&tw_p=tweetbutton&url=https://www.sabrangindia.in/article/democracy-majoritarianism&via=sabrangindia>
email
<[email protected]?subject=SabrangIndia%20:%20Democracy%20as%20Majoritarianism&body=https://www.sabrangindia.in/article/democracy-majoritarianism>
*Subhash Gatade's *Hinduta's Second Coming* deals with the question of
normalisation of majoritarianism which India is currently witnessing. The
book is divided into three sections. The first section tries to situate
this issue in a larger South-Asian context and to find any commonality in
the experiences of people and the societal roots of the current political
shift in South-Asia. Section two of the book deals with the "pioneers of
the Hindutva Supremacist" movement and their upcoming icons for the "New
India". Section three is devoted to finding ways to fight this menace that
is attempting to destroy India. *

*The following is an extract from the Preface of the book.*



*Democracy as Majoritarianism*

*“**We can never forget that everything that Hitler did in Germany
was ‘legal,’ and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did was
‘illegal.’ It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany,
but I am sure that if  I lived in Germany during that time I would have
comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal… we who engage in
nonviolent direct action are not creators of  tension. We merely bring to
the surface the hidden tension that is already alive.*

*— Martin Luther King, Jr*

What is the signature of democracy?

It is the understanding that minority voices will be allowed to flourish
and they will not be bulldozed. At  the  apparent  level  majoritarianism
–  rule  by  majority –  sounds  very  similar  to  democracy  but  it
essentially  stands democracy  on  its  head.  For  real  democracy  to
thrive,  it  is essential that ideas and principles of  secularism are at
its core. The idea that there will be a clear separation between state and
religion and there won’t be any discrimination on the basis of religion has
to be its guiding principle.

Majoritarianism clearly defeats democracy in idea as well as practice.

While democracy’s metamorphosis into majoritarianism is a real danger,
under rule of capital – especially its present phase of neoliberalism –
another lurking danger is its evolution into what can be called as
plutocracy – government by the rich.

As India enters the race for elections to the 17th Lok Sabha, these are the
two broad questions which are staring in everyone’s mind, whether the same
dynamic – which has made the last five years as unique in Independent
India’s history – will continue or we will witness a rupture.

It is a disturbing scenario when the biggest democracy in the world seems
to have taken a ‘[Q]uantum Jump In Wrong Direction Since 2014’ (Amartya
Sen) – prompting even the normally reticent community of scientists to ask
people to reject the politics which
‘.[d]ivides us, creates fears, and marginalises a large fraction of our
society’ and remind them that “[D]iversity is our democracy’s greatest
strength; discrimination and non-inclusivity strike at its very foundation.’

Whether   there   would   be   further   normalisation   of majoritarianism
or ordinary people’s desire to live a more inclusive, egalitarian life and
in a less toxic world would ultimately triumph the designs of the
hatemongers and secondly, whether free run being given to the crony
capitalists and moneybags would be over and ideas of redistribution would
make a comeback with vengeance.

What has added a new dimension to this dynamic is the existence of a
‘self-proclaimed cultural organisation’ called RSS – whose principles,
ideology and activities contravene the very basis of Constitution – which
is *de facto*ruling the country. It  is  an  organisation  whose
principles  “[d]epicting  Indian nationalism in terms of the faith of the
religious majority – have serious negative social and political
implications for sections of  the citizen-body and are in violation of  the
Constitution.” (http://caravandaily.com/rss-principles-are-in-violation-of-
 constitution-detrimental-to-india-hamid-ansari/)

It was exactly 42 years back that Indian people defeated the attempts to
throttle the democratic experiment by their more secretive, sinister and
communal forces are on ascent who are also popular among a significant
section of people.

*Courtesy: Indian Cultural Forum*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to