*http://peoplesvoice.in/2017/03/06/can-madrassas-compared-rss-run-schools/
<http://peoplesvoice.in/2017/03/06/can-madrassas-compared-rss-run-schools/>*





*Can Madarassas be compared with RSS run Schools?*



*Ram Puniyani*



Digvijay Singh’s tweet ‘Madrassas and Sarswati Shishu mandirs (SSM), both
spread hate’ (Feb 23 2017) has evoked lot of response from diverse
sections. On one hand Muslim groups have taken him on for demonization of
Madrassas, and on the other, RSS supporters have come out attesting the
utility of SSM and criticizing him for comparing SSM with Madrassas which
are ‘dens of terror’ according them.



The demonization of Madrassas Worldwide began particularly after the 9/11
2001, when US media propagated the phrase ‘Islamic Terrorism’. This was the
time when the role of Taliban-Al Qaeda, trained in Madrassas of Pakistan
came to the fore. The type of education given in these few Madarssas became
synonym with ‘Madrassas’ as such. This is far away from truth as the
Madrassas in Pakistan where the indoctrination for terror took place were
few in number and are not representative of Madarssaa education and its
system in any way.



As such Madrassas education in India has been fairly old. It was mainly
sticking to recitation of Koran in particular, ‘learning it by rote’
method. There is a long history of religious and secular education among
Muslims, in India. The Muslim religious education focusing on Islam and
training of Ulema culminated in establishment of many well known seminaries
like Deoband and Barelvi. Muslim secular education began with the efforts
of Sir Syed, who contributed massively in introduction of modern, rational
and scientific education among Muslim. Interestingly Maulanas of most
seminaries were against British rule, supportive of freedom movement and
opposed to partition of the country.



Today Madrassa education in India is restricted to hardly
<http://minorityaffairs.gov.in/reports/sachar-committee-report> 2-3% of
Muslim children. Mostly poor, un-affording Muslims send their children
there. These schools are also in the areas where the reach of public
schooling system is not high. Some Madrassas also support the food and
lodge for the children which become an additional incentive for poor
Muslims to send their children, away from the *mainstream system* which is
inaccessible to them anyway. While not totally keeping pace with the Modern
education, at places these Madrassas have tried to introduce subjects like
English, Mathematics and other secular subjects.



In contrast in Pakistan few Madarassas, where Al Qaeda and its clones had
been given training, were part of the US plan to raise fanatic groups which
could be marshaled to join the battle against Soviet Forces which had
occupied Afghanistan towards the end of cold war. These Pakistan based
madrassas adopted a distorted version of Islam, totally intolerant to
dissent; promoting violence against infidels (kafirs) in the name of Jihad.
These madrassas were supported by the US goals of control of oil resources
of West Asia. Their syllabus was planned from Washington. Their genesis and
growth had three pillars: US planning and funding, distorted version of
Islam from Saudi Arabia and their location in Pakistan. The generalization
that all Madarassas are dens of terror; came up through vested propaganda.
Few Madarassas which played the negative role are being equated to whole
Madrassa system, so to say. This generalization prevalent in society has
gone far and deep and this is what gets manifested in the tweet by Digvijay
Singh, which says “Is there a difference between Madrassas and Sarswati
Shishu Mandir Schools run by RSS? I don’t think so. Both spread Hatred
<https://twitter.com/digvijaya_28?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>.” Similarly earlier
Buddhadeb Bhattachrya, the CM of West Bengal had also commented on
Madrassas in the negative tone.



On a totally different wavelength RSS combine, who are working for the goal
of Hindu Rashtra, has set up Sarswati Shishu Mandirs, which along with
other institutions set up by this combine are schools propagating the World
view of Hindu nationalism. They have been making news off and on for the
content of their curriculum
<https://www.countercurrents.org/comm-angana1121103.htm>. The demonization
of Muslim kings, glorification of Hindu kings, spread of Islam by sword,
the conspiracy of Christian missionaries, the unsuitability of secularism
for our country, the folly of Gandhi-Nehru in imposing western secularism
on India are the regular part of the syllabus of these schools.
Additionally caste gender-biases and glorification of nationalism of Hitler
and Mussolini are the ground on which these children are raised. It is this
combination which makes the students of these schools to look at Muslim and
Christians differently. It is due to this that Gandhi and Nehru are looked
down by the products of these schools.



Their curriculum distorts the history to create dislike for religious
minorities and also, undermines rational thinking and scientific temper and
promotes the mythology of ‘We have been the World teachers, equipped with
all the wisdom and scientific achievements like plastic surgery, aviation
science or stem cell technology.’ These notions are being made to seep in
the society very subtly and deeply; adding to the foundation of
sectarianism which have be part of RSS propaganda
<https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-ideology-of-RSS-Why-do-they-spread-hatred-towards-Muslims>.
It is not a religious education so to say; it is motivated by the political
agenda of sectarian nationalism.



The need for differentiating wheat from chaff is urgent and great. While
some Madrassas, based in Pakistan, surely sowed seeds of hatred for those
differing from their own rigid interpretation of Islam to the extent of
doing violence against those differing from them, most madarassas are
centers for Islamic education. SSM’s on the contrary are the ones
disseminating education along with Hindutva political views.

Leaving aside the Madarassas where Al Qaeda clones were groomed, the whole
Madarassa system is very diverse. They cannot all be put in the same
category of spreading Hate, the way Mr. Singh is doing. Such expression are
superficial, non factual and also show that leaders like Mr. Singh are
unwilling to do their home work to understand the genesis of terrorism in
West Asia, its etiology being in the politics of oil control masquerading
as Islam. It is an unfounded generalization which demonizes the minorities
and sows the seeds of suspicion against them which is not in the interest
of our country.



-

https://www.countercurrents.org/comm-angana1121103.htm

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-ideology-of-RSS-Why-do-they-spread-hatred-towards-Muslims

http://himalmag.com/the-madrassa-and-the-state-of-pakistan-tariq-rahman/

https://twitter.com/digvijaya_28?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

http://minorityaffairs.gov.in/reports/sachar-committee-report

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to