http://peoplesvoice.in/2017/02/21/nationality-indian-hindu/


*What is our Nationality: Indian or Hindu?*


Ram Puniyani


Debate around the words Hindu, Hinduism, Hindutva is not new. Recently the
assertion by Mohan Bhagwat, the Sarsanghchalk (Supreme Dictator) of RSS
that ‘everyone living in India is Hindu’ and that Muslims might be Muslim
by religion but they are Hindus by nationality’, is yet another
interpretation of Word Hindu. He said that this is Hindustan so all those
living here are Hindu. Both these, Hindu is a nationality and we are
Hindustan are erroneous formulations in today’s context and need to be
examined from the point of view of Indian Constitution.


Bhagwat at times says that Muslim’s way of worship-faith might have changed
but their Nationality remains Hindu! Over nearly two decades ago when Murli
Manohar Joshi, was the President of BJP, he had stated that we are all
Hindus, Muslims are Ahmadiyya Hindus and Christians are Christi Hindus.
These statements are part of the newer formulation of RSS which in a way
are in tune with the ideology of RSS, which regards India as a Hindu
nation. Their earlier ideologues had a different take on the issue.


Their current formulation is based on the confusion about the word
Hindustan. Simply put the RSS ideologues state that this country is
Hindustan, as all people living here are Hindus. This is a circular
argument. The word Hindustan needs to be re-examined in today’s context as
many words keep changing their usage historically. One knows that the word
Hindu is not there in Holy Hindu scriptures. The word Hindu was coined by
those coming from Western Asia. They identified this land in the name of
the river Sindhu. They use the word H more often than the word S, so Sindhu
became Hindu. The word Hindu thus begins as a geographical category. Built
around this; the word Hindusthan comes up, the land on East of river
Sindhu.


The religious traditions prevalent in this part of the World were multiple
and diverse. Unlike in Islam and Christianity Hinduism has no prophet.
Origin of the diverse traditions here are of local origin. In due course
the word Hindu came to be used for conglomeration of diverse religious
traditions prevalent here, and these traditions were lumped together as
Hinduism. Within Hinduism there are two major types of traditions, the
dominant Brahmanical one and the Shamanic traditions, like Nath, Tantra,
Bhakti, Shaiva and Siddhanta. During colonial period the identity of
Hinduism was constructed more around Brahmanical norms.


This historical identification of our region as Hindustan was not around
religion, but around geographical area, Hind-Hindu. The confusion is due to
the fact that same word Hindu was initially used for the ‘area’ and then
for religious traditions. Today the word Hindustan is not appropriate, as
per the Indian Constitution and as per the global recognition now we are
India not Hindustan. ‘India that is Bharat’ to be more precise! That’s what
our Constitution says we are. So what is our Nationality, is it Indian or
Hindu? RSS refused to be part of the process of ‘India as a nation in the
making’, it was not a part of freedom movement. The rise of RSS politics
came to oppose the concept of India. Concept of India was brought up by the
modern sections of society, the industrialists, workers and modern educated
classes. This concept had parallel and integrated aspirations of women and
Dalits. Here it is important to see that India stands for Liberty, Equality
and Fraternity. Hindu nation stands for pre-Modern values in the modern
garb. India has the Constitution which recognizes diversity and pluralism.
Hindu nation harps back to imaginary glories of the past where birth based
hierarchies of caste and gender were the core aspect of social laws. That’s
how RSS ideologues are uncomfortable with Indian Constitution and always
invoke Holy books (i.e. Manusmriti for example) as the model code for
current times.


What about the religious minorities, Muslims and Christians being Hindus?
As per the founder of Hindutva ideology, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Hindu is
one who regards this land from Sindhu to seas as his father land and holy
land. In his definition of Hindus, Christians and Muslims are not called
Hindus, as per him they have different nationality. The second major
Hindutva ideologue Golwalkar also follows this line and in his book ‘Bunch
of Thoughts’, regards Muslims and Christians as ‘threat to ‘Hindu nation’.
It is lately that RSS after gaining political strength wants to assimilate
the religious minorities and wants to impose Hindu norms on these minority
communities, so the assertion that they may be so and so but their
nationality is Hindu. As per the Indian Constitution our nationality is
Indian. So the contrast between RSS ideology and ideology of Gandhi, Nehru,
Ambedkar and myriad other; who stood for Indian nationalism. Indian
Constitution with its libertarian message of justice and equality is in
contrast to the injustice inherent in Manu Smriti, the holy Hindu scripture.


To say that Muslims have merely changed their mode of worship is a
deliberate move to co-opt them into the fold of Hindu nationalism. Adopting
Islam not merely change in ways of worship, it is a faith in a different
religion. This can apply to Christianity also. So Muslims have Islam,
Christians have Christianity, Hindus have Hinduism, but their nationality
is Indian not Hindu. To expect that Muslims will also have Aarti and chant
‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’ is not as per Indian Constitution. Aarti is a Hindu
ritual. If people of different religions wish to adopt the holy rituals of
other religions it’s their choice. It may relate to Aarti or Namaz or a
prayer in Church. But to expect that they should do it; is anti democratic
and against the norms of Indian Constitution. Many Muslims do feel that
they can bow only to Allah and no other deity, so many of them are opposed
to chanting ‘Bharat mata ki jai’ (Hail mother India), so be it. It’s what
is in tune with our Constitution.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to