*Growing Intolerance in a Tolerant Society*

*RAM PUNIYANI
<http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/ByLine/index/4/Opinion/RAM-PUNIYANI> *

Towards the end of 2015 many writers and eminent citizens returned their
national honors; protesting against the growing atmosphere of intolerance.
The list was long and this acted as a process where some introspection took
place in society. Still the ruling dispensation and its associates in Hindu
right wing politics, the RSS combine, began criticizing those who returned
their awards, accusing them of being politically motivated. They were also
criticized for doing so to influence the forthcoming state assembly
elections in Bihar.

Most of the awardees stood their ground as the perceptions about tolerance;
freedom of expression had crossed the threshold and had undergone
qualitative change. This gets confirmed in a 2015 report by US Commission
for International Religious Freedom. This USCIRF is a bipartisan US Federal
Government Commission. This is first of its kind in the World and is aiming
at defending the universal right to freedom of religion or belief in the
World. The report is scathing and points out the state of religious freedom
in India. As per the report, freedom in India is on a negative trajectory,
religious tolerance deteriorated and ‘religious freedom’ violations
increased during 2015.

The report points out, “In 2015, religious tolerance deteriorated and
religious freedom violations increased in India…minority communities
especially Christians, Muslims and Sikhs experienced numerous incidents of
intimidation, harassment and violence, largely at the hands of Hindu
nationalist groups.” The report outlines the violations and points that
USCRIF will continue to monitor the situation and may have to recommend to
the state department that India should be kept under ‘the country with
particular concern’. It is a significant report which goes on say that US
Government should keep this in mind while shaping the bilateral contacts
with India and future of ‘strategic dialogues’ should be determined
according to that.

The report suggests that the Indian Government publicly rebut officials and
religious leaders who make derogatory statements about religious
communities. This is the crux of the matter. Those understanding Indian
politics know by now more clearly than before that the leaders making
derogatory comments are either directly part of the ruling party, like
Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti, Giriraj Singh (both ministers at the center) or
leading members of Parliament like Yogi Adityanath or Sakshi Maharaj. Then
there are others who belong to the affiliate organizations like VHP,
Bajrang Dal, which again are part of the broader Sangh Privar or more
precisely RSS Combine.

When these statements derogatory to religious minorities are made some from
the ruling party will come forward to say that this is not the official
position of the party and stop at that. There is neither a reprimand
neither demotion of the person concerned. Many have made these derogatory
comments even before coming to power like Giriraj Singh but despite that
they have been given the positions of power. At these times Narendra Modi,
who is presented as a powerful Prime Minister keeps silent for weeks and
later comes out with some lame unconvincing statement, which does not take
away from the impunity of those indulging in such hate speech.

As such it seems to be a coordinated game. Someone makes the provocative
statement, and some others from the RSS stable come to defend/justify
him/her and some other say it is not official while the PM maintains a
deliberate silence. Interestingly some statements need not sound derogatory
to begin with. Hindutva’s patriarch RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat’s statement
about shouting Bharat Mata ki Jai (Hail mother India) is very revealing.
First, he said that we should teach the younger generation to say this.
Then he took a step back saying it should not be compulsory. In response to
this Asaduddin Owaisi of MIM gave an unwarranted statement that he will not
say so even if a knife is put to his throat. To take the story further
Maharashtra Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said it is a must for all
those who want to stay in India. As a matter of fact this is a subtle
intimidation of the religious minorities who don’t worship anybody but
Allah as per Bharat Mata ki Jai, it becomes like hailing mother Goddess,
which they say is not permitted by Islam.

The RSS fellow traveler Yoga guru and entrepreneur Ramdev said that had the
Constitution not been there by now lakhs would have been beheaded. These
are comments from the top rungs of the political establishment these days.
The writers of the report in their naivety may have given this suggestion,
not knowing that currently the protection for such divisiveness is coming
from the top echelons.

This is not an enviable situation for democracy in India. The quality of
democracy is to be judged by the degree of safety and security of the
religious minorities. True, even earlier also anti minority violence was
part of the Indian political landscapethere but now with the BJP Government
at centre the intolerance and divisiveness has undergone a sea change. What
the awardees were feeling has lots of truth; the feeling of insecurity is
accompanied by the gag on freedom of expression, which is going together
with the intolerance.

The report has come out at a time Modi is packing his bags for a major trip
to the US. But at best it will probably be another document for the
libraries.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to