*Rohith Vemula: Hindutva Politics and Dalit Question Today*


*Ram Puniyani*

The death of Rohith Vemula has been projected as suicide by some and murder
by others, depending on their political orientation. Rohith’s being dalit
and his participation in Ambedkar Students Association (ASA) and active
contribution to this politically vibrant dalit group is the major cause of
his death. Apart from issues directly related to dalits, this association
did raise the issues related to democratic rights which are relevant today,
like beef eating, opposition to death penalty; as was given to Mumbai blast
accuses Yakub Memon and went on to screen the film *Muzzafarnagar Baki hai*.
This film on Muzzafarnangar violence (2013) exposes the role of communal
forces.

The ABVP, which nationally has become hyperactive since the Modi Sarkar
came to power (May 2014) opposed all these issues as a part of their Hindu
nationalist agenda. The freedom of expression in the academic campuses is
very basic in a democratic society. ABVP, the student’s wing of RSS, could
not digest the dalit group taking up issues related to secularism and
democracy. The cause of Vemula’s death becomes clear in the light of the
issues raised by ASA. Rohith’s own understanding on these issues becomes
clear from his face book posts on these issues. For example let’s see what
he wrote on beef issue, “Eating beef and celebrating beef eating is an act
of solidarity with all those who are getting murdered on this reason
nationwide. If we fail to see the fact that the BJP-RSS-VHP scheme of
anti-beef campaign is essentially a tool to persecute Muslim minorities in
this country, we would regret for being the mute spectators of another mass
unrest in OUR COUNTRY. The whole cow myth is less anti-Dalit today and more
of anti-Muslim propaganda.”

His understanding of the deeper democratic politics, not being restricted
to so-called dalit issues is more than obvious here. The issues of
marginalized sections- dalits, Adivasis, women and workers and religious
minorities are deeply interwoven with each other. He is very right that
today the issue of beef eating is raised on emotive pitch mainly to
intimidate and target the Muslim minorities, irrespective of the fact that
other sections of society also consume it in good measure. The issue of
Muzzafar nagar film is also related to Muslim minorities at one level. At
deeper level it is a part of communal politics, which wants to polarize the
community along religious lines to impose Hindu nationalism which is
against the concept of *rights* as such. At yet another level his
participation in the protest to oppose the death penalty to terrorism
accused Yakub Memon; is more from the angle of humanism; opposition to
death penalty as such. There is a global movement to oppose the death
penalty irrespective of the nature of crime and those with deeper humane
values worldwide and in India do support the abolition of death penalty. It
was not an act of supporting terrorism in any way.

Annoyed by these secular democratic Human positions taken by ASA, ABVP did
come to clash with ASA at ideological level. ABVP president Susheel Kumar
complained that he was beaten up. According to the first committee which
investigated this alleged physical assault the complaint was baseless. With
the change of Vice Chancellor the matters started changing. The pressure of
BJP central minister B.Dattatrey backed up by the authority of MHRD
minister Smriti Irani, Rohith and his four friends were penalized; their
scholarship was stopped and they were evicted from hostel.

>From his letter to the present Vice Chancellor (VC) asking for dalit
students being given poison and a rope, what comes to surface is that the
VC with his authoritarian anti dalit orientation, deliberately ignored the
letter, leading to this tragedy. The response to Rohith’s death from the
ruling dispensation has been very revealing of the politics which they
espouse. Mr. Dattatreya, in tandem with the local ABVP, termed the ASA
activities as being ‘den of casteist, extremists and anti-national
politics’. MHRD minister true to her mindset asserted that it is not a
dalit issue while some others doubted Rohith being a dalit, as his mother
was a dalit but father was OBC. This was to undermine the intense
injustices due to which Rohith had to take his life. A small video, trying
to create sensation, is being circulated on the social media. This video is
trying to present Rohith as being a supporter of terrorists’.

In the TV debates the RSS-BJP spokespersons are coming down heavily on the
anti national; casteist politics. To cap it all the timing and nature of
expression from Prime Minster says it all. Mr. Modi who generally is a very
vocal person; he does not keep quiet on issues which expose his agenda of
Hindutva. His earlier being quiet for long on the lynching of Mohammad
Akhlaq is a case in point. In Rohith’s case also after five days of being
quiet, he artificially tried to present a tear jerker, ‘Ma Bharati has lost
a son’, while his party men, cabinet colleague, have been calling him anti
national. This was Modi’s way of putting under the carpet the underlying
issue of anti dalit atrocities, the anti dalit stance of the University
administration, BJP M.P. Mr. Dattatreya, MHRD ministry and ABVP whose joint
actions has caused this death.

In a way the whole issue shows the dilemma of Hidnutva politics. On one
hand it is intensifying the activities aimed at opposing secular values,
intensifying intimidation of dalits-minorities and opposing the voices
standing for democratic values. With Modi sarkar coming to power all the
RSS combine organizations have got a shot in the arms. They are getting a
strong political patronage to oppose other political tendencies. We have
earlier seen the role of Central Government in unsuccessfully banning
Ambedkar Periya Study Circle in IIT Madras. In most of the academic
campuses the communal student groups have become more assertive, knowing
full well that the authorities in charge are either pro Hindutva or they
will buckle under the pressure from the top to implement BJP agenda.
Pursuing the campaigns for social justice is being opposed very strongly.
In the same direction their; RSS progeny Samajik Samrasta Manch; is very
active. What is being said is that they don’t believe in caste, all castes
are equal! What it means is that they want to overlook the caste issue as
they want to retain caste hierarchy in newer situation by using more subtle
expressions. Those who want to eradicate a particular disease; first
recognize it so that it can be dealt with, ignoring caste issues or keeping
quiet about it means that they want the present caste equations to continue.

Mr. Prime Minster in his Ambedkar University address, before moistening his
eyes, was lecturing the students that they should emulate Ambedkar who
endured insults and humiliation without complaint. Similar thing was stated
by Mr. Rajnath Singh also. One recalls that Prof. Y. Sudarshan Rao who was
earlier the Chairman of ICHR, appointed by this Government also defended
caste hierarchy by saying that nobody complained against it. So on one side
there is an attempt to appropriate Ambedkar as Hindutva icon, and on the
other Hindutva agenda of preserving caste hierarchy is being rolled out
through the concrete interventions by different affiliates of Hindu
nationalism.

--

http://www.thecitizen.in/NewsDetail.aspx?Id=6660&Rohith/Vemula:/Of//Hindutva/Politics/and/the/Dalit/Question/Today

-

Key words; # Rohith Vemula, # Smriti Irani # Bandaru Dattatrey #Ambedkar
Periyar Study circle, #Ambedkar Students Asscociation, # RSS # Hindutva
Agenda #Samajik Samrasta Manch #Modi #death penalty # beef festival # Yaku
Memon, #caste hierarchy # Hindu nationalism


--

www.pluralindia.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to