*Travails  of being a Muslim in India*

*Shah Rukh Khan, Aamir Khan and the Intolerance Debate*



*Ram Puniyani*



The release of Shahrukh Khan’s film Dilwale (December 2015) was accompanied
by protests by Shiv Sena and other Hindutva groups. These protests were
supposedly against his comment on the growing intolerance in India.
Shahrukh Khan; on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday few weeks ago had
said that there is a growing intolerance in India and that being non
secular is the worst crime for a patriot. In response to this the Hindutva
cabal descended on him and he was labeled as anti-Nationalist, unpatriotic
and that he should go to Pakistan. The BJP general secretary Kailash
Vijayvargheey said that he lives in India but his soul is in Pakistan.
Shahrukh did come with a sort of apology when he said that ‘really sorry if
someone felt bad’, he also said that he is not saying this as his film is
going to be released but that he means it. On the back of this Kailash
Vijayvargiya again tweeted that Nationalists have taught a lesson to the
morons (*nalayaks*)



It is not the first time that Shahrukh Khan is being subject to such base
abuses and charges of being anti national. In 2010, when he supported the
idea of Pakistani cricket players to be allowed to come for IPL matches,
Mumbai Hindutva group Shiv Sena protested intensely and the posters of his
film, ‘My name is Khan’ were torn. At another level he has also been the
victim of global Islamophobia as he was interrogated and strip searched
twice in America. The other stars who have received similar fate are Aamir
Khan and Dileep Kumar (Yusuf Khan). In the current times Aamir Khan while
talking on the occasion of Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award
function shared his anguish that his wife Kiran Rao feels unsafe
particularly for their son. To this Yogi Adityanath, the BJP MP retorted
that Aamir Khan is talking like Hafiz Sayeed of Pakistan and that it will
be better if he goes to Pakistan.



Aamir Khan in his statement clarified that he had never thought of leaving
India that he will continue to live in India and quoted Rabindranath
Tagore’s poem, ‘Where head is held high…’ The label of unpatriotic and anti
national were freely hurled upon him by different worthies of Sangh
Parivar, and interestingly these had full sanction of the top leaders of
the party and the Parivar as none of them came forward to reprimand those
hurling the abuses. One of the leaders of VHP in a talk show said that when
a person like Shah Rukh Khan makes such a comment; the whole community
comes under the scanner. Making it clear that Muslim community is suspect
for VHP and its associates.



One also recalls the plight of thespian; Peshawar born, Dileep Kumar when
he supported the film by Deepa Mehta, Fire. The Shiv Sena volunteers
protested in front of his house wearing underwear’s. (1998). When he was
awarded Nishan-e-Imtiyaz, the highest civilian honor of Pakistan, there was
a lot of protest that he should not receive it. He went on to accept the
honor. The Hindu nationalists in their spree of hurling abuses on him
called him anti National, un-patriotic etc. Dileep Kumar was so shaken and
disturbed that he approached the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee,
who went on to defend Dileep Kumar’s nationalist credentials. Vajpayee
seems to be the only exception to the *abuse hurling*, keeping silent to
approve what others are saying leaders of BJP and company. Incidentally
India’s one of ex Prime Minister Morarji Desai was also recipients of this
award from Pakistan.



What is most striking in this episode is the differential response to
similar statements in the recently witnessed intolerance debate. Just to
recall the atmosphere got very heated up by and by due to various factors.
The statements of Hindutva leaders like Sakhi Maharaj, Sadhavi Niranjan
Jyoti, Yogi Adiyanath, Manoharlal Khattar, Kailsh Vijayvarhiya and Sangeet
Som shook the roots of our society down deep. The silence of Prime Minister
indicated that all this is being with full connivance of the BJP-RSS. The
precipitating point came with the murders of Dabholkar, Pansare and
Kalburgi and lynching of Akhlaq. The response to all this came in the form
of returning awards and issue of statements by former Admiral Ramdas,
academics, historians and activists. The ‘uncoordinated spontaneous’ award
returning began and went on mostly till the results of Bihar elections came
out. These results acted as soothing balm on the tensed nerves of the
society and so the process of award returning came to a halt barring one
exception of Jayanta Mahapatra, who returned award after the Bihar assembly
election results.



What is noteworthy is that during the process of returning awards right
from President Pranab Mukherjee to industrialists Narayan Murthy, Kiran
Majumdar Shaw and RBI governor Raghuram Rajan all stated that there is a
growing atmosphere of intolerance. Interestingly only Muslim icons were
chosen for the intense attacks, doubting their patriotism! Those non
Muslims were dubbed as being motivated by political reasons. None dared
take on Presidents’ observations. So what does this indicate? Aamir Khan
correctly pointed out that response to his statement does finally prove
that there is growing intolerance, if at all there was some doubt about it.
The differential response to Muslims statements and similar statements made
by non Muslims gives the game away and tells us the type of mindset the RSS
affiliates; the followers of Hindu nationalism and their followers have.



One recalls that in the wake of acts of terror like Mecca Masjid, Malegaon,
Ajmer and Samjhauta Express; number of Muslim youth was being arrested
recklessly. After Hemant Karakare’s investigation showed that it was the
Hindutva groups with Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt Col Purohit, Major
Upadhayay and Swami Aseemanand; who have role in those acts of blast; the
arrest of Muslim youth got a respite. In the wake of that I remember having
attended a meeting organized by group Anhad (Act Now for Harmony And
Democracy) in 2009. The theme of meet was ‘What it means to be a Muslim in
India?”. With great disbelief I heard prominent Muslim writers and
activists pouring their heart out and confessing that they do feel that
Muslims are being given a differential treatment and they have started
feeling the pain of being a Muslim. Most of these friends are known mainly
for being activist or for their literary contributions, much beyond their
religious identity. This is what currently Naseeruddin Shah said that
lately he is being made aware of his Muslim identity. And on similar vein
Julio Rebeiro said that ‘as a Christian suddenly I am a stranger in my own
country’.



India has been a democracy with good space for secular, plural values. This
has been much better than most of the countries in South Asia, where the
democratic processes are comparatively weaker. Countries like Saudi Arabia
are nowhere close what we have achieved in matters of democratic processes.
It is disgusting to hear when India is compared with these countries in
some way. We have been pursuing a path ahead towards better human rights,
not a regressive path which countries with authorization, semi
fundamentalist regimes have been pursuing. To say that Indian Muslims are
better off than the Muslims in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia is degrading our
own system which has emerged due to the freedom struggle, our system which
is trying to keep Indian Constitution as the reference point. Needless to
say we do need a course correction and those following the politics in the
name of religion need to be countered to preserve our democratic-plural
values.



Key Words #intolerance #Shah Rukh Khan #Aamir Khan # Pakistan #Kailash
Vijayvargiy # Yogi Adityanath #insecurity #BJP led NDA # Modi # RSS Combine

--

www.pluralindia.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to