*Saluting Courage: Memorial for Vasant Rajab*

*Ram Puniyani*



Gujarat violence (2002) was horrific. In this, after the burning of train
in Godhra in which 58 innocents died, the same tragedy was made the pretext
to launch the massive violence in which over one thousand people perished.
In the aftermath of that I got many occasions to visit different parts of
Gujarat and also to come to know about two legendary youth who had laid
down their life to protect the people when the communal violence was going
on in Ahmadabad in July 1946. These two young men, Vasant Rao Hegishte and
Rajab Ali Lakhani, close friends and workers of Congress Seva Dal, came to
the streets to stop the killings. Vasant Rao trying to protect Muslims and
Rajab Ali stood firm to save the Hindus. Both were done to death by the
mobs.



The activists in Gujarat started celebrating 1st July as the day of
communal harmony. Recognizing this fact government in Gujarat has raised a
memorial in their memory, Bandhutva Smarak (Brotherhood Memorial). In the
news of coverage of this program what struck me was that while Vasant Rao’s
relatives were present for the program, the relatives of Rajab Ali were not
there.



The acts of violence continued in the country after 1946 with increasing
intensity. Relatives of Rajab Ali were targeted in the subsequent violence
to the extent that first they started concealing their relationship with
Rajab Ali, then started assuming Hindu names and finally some of them not
only adopted Hindu religion, but also migrated to Canada and US! The person
who stood for the amity of religious communities must not have envisaged
that while he stood for such noble values, his own kin will be subject of
attack by the divisive elements. This also reflects the trajectory of
events where in India the Hindu-Muslim violence led to the condition where
Muslims started feeling insecure. This in turn led ghettoisation. Today the
percentage of religious minorities as the victim of communal violence is
number of times more than their percentage in population. The ministry of
Home affairs data of 1991, quoted by researches show that while Muslims
were 12 odd percent in population then, they formed over 80% as the victims
of communal violence.



In the aftermath of Gujarat violence one also saw that while a large number
of prominent Hindus and Muslims were part of peace efforts, at the level
also activists of both communities came forward for peace efforts. Today
with the new Government in power the number of communal incidents has gone
up by 25% right in just one year. The overall direction of the
intercommunity relations is on trial and the fate of peace maker Rajab
Ali’s kin is a sad reminder of the state of affairs.



Communal violence, violence in the name of religion, has been the cancerous
phenomenon, which came into being with the colonial policies of British,
policy of ‘divide and rule’. They introduced communal historiography where
the religion of king became the central marker of his rule and his major
policies related to taxation were down played. Kingdoms’ central focus of
power and wealth was substituted by ‘religious identity’ and this was
picked up by communal organizations. These communal organizations remained
aloof from freedom movement and did their best in spreading hate against
the ‘other’ religious community. Communal clashes began and there by a
‘social common sense’, which looks down on the other community; became the
norm. The prevalence of myths, stereotypes, biases against minorities came
in handy for the practitioners of communal politics in instigating the
violence. The conclusions of investigation of communal violence and lately
Yale University study tells us that, the areas where the violence takes
place, the instigating communal organization becomes electorally strong and
that’s what we are witnessing in India today. Climbing the ladder of
violence the communal organizations come to the seat of power.



With increasing violence many a leaders voiced their concern for peace and
amity. Gandhi and his close associates were the main force for promoting
amity, Hindu Muslim Unity being the central credo of Gandhi’s politics.
Notwithstanding that; violence went on rising in intensity and people like
Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi went to the extent of laying down their lives to
quell the riots, to save the innocents’, that’s what the victims of
communal violence are.



Today we are in a phase where the violence has changed its form; from the
massive bloody phenomenon to sub-radar actions where the minorities get
intimidated on some issue of mosque or a church or eating beef or some
other social practice. The major goal of communal forces is to polarize the
communities along the religious lines.



What would a Gandhi have done in such a scenario? Many an experiments in
peace have been floated, *Mohalla Committees* (Area level intercommunity
committee), Shanti Sena (Peace Army), Awareness programs about need for
harmony, interfaith dialogues, intercommunity celebration of religious
festivals, promotion of films on harmony, Kabir Festivals have been popular
amongst others. Social activists have also focused on getting justice for
the victims of violence and promoting people to come together for programs
cutting across religious lines. How to undo the ghettoization, how to
create an awareness for amity overcoming negative perceptions does remain a
challenge today, greater than ever before. The issue needs to be addressed
to ensure that the likes of Rajab Ali’s kin do not have to hide or change
their identity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to