*While millions are groaning under the astronomical inflation in everyday
food items, the shenanigans of Sharad Pawar is being covered up by
mainstream media, for reasons best know to their owners. A rare breaking of
rank has Seema Mustafa breaking the news behind the news about how Sharad
Pawar is engaged more in maneuverings to wreck Congress government and
willfully playing truant rather than working to remedy price rise through
his Agricultural ministry. Isn't preposterous that now there is news
floating around about permitting the export of sugar.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai*

---------

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/1821-pawar-begins-political-poker-



*Sharad Pawar begins political poker*

SEEMA MUSTAFA  New Delhi | 2nd Jan

   Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar

nion Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar, quite unperturbed about spiralling
prices and farmers' suicides, is busy building bridges with Congress
detractors. Fishing in troubled UPA waters, Pawar is currently stoking
disgruntled allies to form a pressure group within the government with a
view to garnering support as an interim Prime Minister if Dr Manmohan Singh
is compelled to resign in the New Year.

Pawar, who was on a shaky wicket when UPA 2 came to power as he did not get
the expected number of MPs from Maharashtra, has survived the IPL
controversy to emerge as a contender for the top post. Buoyed by a troubled
Parliament and a stronger Opposition, the Agriculture Minister has doubled
efforts to bring the UPA allies and other parties to his side. His meeting
with rebel Jagan Reddy in New Delhi has caused concern within Congress
circles that see it as part of the "Pawar ploy" to give support to Congress
detractors.

Sharad Pawar was close to Jagan's father, the late Chief Minister of Andhra
Pradesh, Y.S. Rajashekhar Reddy. Congress leaders have always suspected him
of supporting Jagan's rebellion, with the recent 45-minute meeting being
seen by the party as a confirmation of this. It might be recalled that Jagan
Reddy's has been spearheading a campaign against Congress president Sonia
Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, and has emerged as a recognizable
political force in Andhra Pradesh. Congress members point to the fact that
Pawar had earlier made common cause with party rebels like V.C. Shukla and
K. Karunakaran and was "only acting in pattern".
{
Congress leaders have always suspected Pawar of supporting Jagan's
rebellion, and the recent 45-minute meeting is being seen as a confirmation
of this

Pawar, who has a good rapport with Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Prasad Yadav
and Mamata Banerjee has been strengthening lines of communication with Tamil
Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi, a powerful ally in government. The two
jointly addressed an Agriculture Conference in Tamil Nadu where the DMK
leader was full of praise for Pawar and said that he had been personally
invited by the Union Agriculture Minister. Sources pointed out that both
leaders are now in "close contact".

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is unable to tame the Agriculture Minister or
make him accountable for food supplies and prices. He has managed to evade
responsibility and the Congress is not able to confront him on these issues
as Pawar's support has become indispensable for the party to survive in
Maharashtra, the only other major state it controls now besides Andhra
Pradesh. In the latter too Pawar, sources said, is busy fomenting dissent,
with the Congress particularly perturbed as several of its legislators are
hovering around Jagan Reddy.

An emboldened Pawar has now launched a frontal attack against Environment
Minister Jairam Ramesh on the Lavasa Lake City project near Pune, for
proposing action against it. Defending the project Pawar has said that the
Environment Minister "should have consulted my ministry". There has been no
immediate reaction from a stunned government. The Agriculture Minister has
also come out, once again, in strong defence of industrialist Ratan Tata
embroiled in the Niira Radia tapes controversy. He is the only Union
minister to take this position.

As a senior Congress leader who has known Sharad Pawar for a long time said,
"Pawar is able to sense trouble before it actually hits government, and
obviously he is preparing the ground for himself." The 2G scam has weakened
the Congress in Parliament, and the Opposition insistence not to back off
from its demand for a JPC probe heralds prospects of a troubled Parliament
through 2011.
----------------------

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/a/2038


Congress snub for inflationary Sharad Pawar  [image:
Print]<http://www.sunday-guardian.com/a/1-latest-news/2038-congress-snub-for-inflationary-sharad-pawar?tmpl=component&print=1&page=>
 [image:
E-mail]<http://www.sunday-guardian.com/component/mailto/?tmpl=component&link=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zdW5kYXktZ3VhcmRpYW4uY29tL2EvMS1sYXRlc3QtbmV3cy8yMDM4LWNvbmdyZXNzLXNudWItZm9yLWluZmxhdGlvbmFyeS1zaGFyYWQtcGF3YXI%3D>

 KOTA NEELIMA  New Delhi | 9th Jan

   Sharad Pawar (Reuters)

ongress had to sideline Sharad Pawar this week to deal with food inflation
that soared to 18.32%, widening the cracks in the UPA coalition further. The
Ministries of External Affairs, Finance, Commerce and Industry tackled
various aspects of price rise, a primary responsibility of Pawar's Ministry
of Food, Public Distribution and Consumer Affairs.

A sulking Pawar left for Mumbai on Friday as it became clear that he played
little part in the fire-fighting and no meetings were scheduled over the
weekend.

The Congress had long been suspicious of Pawar's interventions ahead of and
during the food price crisis. This comes along with a sense of unease about
his political motives in overlooking his responsibilities as minister,
especially about anticipating food supply and prices.

The latest episode started in December 2010 when onion prices saw a steep
increase from Rs 35 a kg to Rs 65 a kg in just a few days.

According to the Finance Minister on Thursday "three-fourths of food
inflation is explained by inflation in vegetables". The current rate of food
inflation was recorded for the week ending 25 December and to which onion
price rise was a major contributory factor.
{
The Congress had long been suspicious of Pawar's interventions ahead of and
during the food price crisis.

Even while the cause for the onion shortage is being pinned on unseasonal
rains, experts in government felt that the damage to the crop could not have
affected production beyond 20%.

It was also suspected that hoarding and speculation could be the cause for
price escalation, to counter which and increase availability the government
banned the export of onions till 15 January.

However, on 21 December, commenting on the crisis, Pawar said, "Onion prices
will remain high for the next three weeks and the situation is likely to
improve only after two-three weeks." This statement was criticised as being
counter-productive and since then Pawar has stayed away from commenting
about price rise. NCP's D.P. Tripathi argues, "The Cabinet works under the
rule of collective responsibility and there is no point in blaming one
minister for this crisis." But even with Pawar to blame, it might not be
easy for the Congress to answer why it had been slow in countering the price
crisis which had been brewing for about a year.

Even on the issue of onion imports from Pakistan, the Ministry of External
Affairs swung into action only after the food inflation figures headlined on
Thursday this week. The action against hoarders, similarly, was taken on
Friday after the extent of the crisis became public.

Food prices had remained beyond the reach of the common man through last
year. For the week ending 16 January 2010, food inflation had been 17.40%
due to high prices of vegetables and pulses. Even high farm output had
failed to correct the grim situation as thousands of tonnes of food grains
were lost due to inadequate warehousing facilities. This year, with the rate
of inflation worsening, the government might be forced to resort to
short-term remedies to bring immediate relief than more sustainable
solutions.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to