SHARE <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20>  ·
COMMENT<http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article977098.ece#comments>
   ·   
PRINT<http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article977098.ece?css=print>
   ·   T+ <http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article977098.ece#>

The life sentence handed down to Binayak Sen by a Chhattisgarh trial court
on Friday is so over the top and outrageous that it calls into question the
fundamentals of the Indian justice system. The trial judge shocked the
conscience of the nation by finding the eminent doctor and rights activist
guilty of sedition and conspiring to wage war against the state under
Sections 120(B) and 124(A) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 8(1), (2),
(3), and (5) of the draconian Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act, and
Section 39 (2) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (as amended in
2004). The fact that the Chhattisgarh police's case against Dr. Sen
consisted of pretty thin material was taken into the realm of the absurd by
the public prosecutor tying himself in knots in an attempt to burnish the
doctor's alleged sins. So it was that an innocuous email message sent by his
wife, Ilina, to the director of the Indian Social Institute — a Delhi-based
institution which happens to share an acronym with Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence directorate — got converted into “suspicious communication”
with the dreaded “ISI.” Another email referring to an occupant of the White
House as a “chimpanzee” was introduced by the prosecutor as evidence of the
kind of “code language” terrorists resort to. But tragically, it is the
Chhattisgarh police that have had the last laugh in this round.

The broad charge against Dr. Sen of helping the banned Community Party of
India (Maoist) wage war against the state was constructed by the police
around the scaffolding of his supposed relationship with Narayan Sanyal, an
alleged leader of the Maoists who was incarcerated in Raipur jail following
his arrest in 2006. In his capacity as a medical doctor and head of the
People's Union for Civil Liberties, Dr. Sen often met Mr. Sanyal in jail but
each of these meetings, as the jail authorities subsequently testified, was
closely supervised and afforded no opportunity for the conveying of messages
to the Maoist leadership. So the police hit upon the strategy of linking him
to the recovery from Kolkata-based businessman Piyush Guha of a letter
allegedly written by Mr. Sanyal. During the trial, the defence counsel
pointed to numerous holes in the police case, including the introduction of
an unsigned, typewritten letter supposedly sent by the Maoists to Dr. Sen,
despite the fact that the letter found no mention in the attested list of
documents recovered from his residence the same day. It goes without saying
that Dr. Sen has the right to appeal the conviction and the savage sentence.
The higher judiciary, which did not exactly cover itself in glory by denying
him bail for nearly two years, must ensure the expeditious hearing of his
appeal and grant him immediate bail till the end of the appeal process.

-- 












































http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article977098.ece

Adv Kamayani Bali Mahabal
+919820749204
skype-lawyercumactivist
*
*
*"Nobody is giving up violence. Neither the state nor the Maoists are giving
up violence. I am interested in furthering my cause, which is the cause of
peace with justice.- DR BINAYAK SEN *
*www.binayaksen.net*
*FACEBOOK EVENT: ONE MILLION FACES
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=179177728772740*
*FACEBOOK GROUP *
*http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14205312918*<http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14205312918>
*
*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to