----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Niloufer Bhagwat 
  To: matthias chang ; [email protected] ; Come Carpentier ; gajendra singh ; 
[email protected] ; Osamu NIIKURA ; Marjorie Cohen ; Perlinder 
Mitchell ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Ian Douglas ; Denis 
Halliday ; Boyle, Francis ; [email protected] ; [email protected] 
; evelyn dürmayer ; Michel Collon ; HQ ; [email protected] ; hana al 
bayaty ; abdul noone 
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 1:17 PM
  Subject: DEFEATING THE BLOCKADE ON AID TO HAITI AND THE RECENT JUDGEMENT OF 
THE SUPREME COURT ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 


   Dear Colleagues,
        
    In the context of the recent Judgement of the US Supreme Court on campaign
  contributions I have to invite your attention to the article on Information 
Clearing
  House titled -'Olbermann: US government for sale .'

  In this context  for the last several months , since March 2009 I have been 
trying to forward
  an article on " Independence of the Judiciary , Constitutional Myth and 
Political
  Reality ", a study on the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the USA and 
India
  on vital issues in which I had analysed the historical and contemporary 
trends, as the
  recent decision is only a continuation of the trend .However it was 
obstructed from being
   forwarded and never got off the Internet, though it was strictly a juridical 
analysis
  which was written at the request of the International Association of 
Democratic
  Lawyers. There seems to have been some aspect of the analysis which was
  considered lethal .

   Another legal aspect for your consideration is that the statute of the 
International
  Criminal Court in respect of  its limited jurisdiction violates the Geneva 
Conventions
  on the Laws of War which provide for Universal Jurisdiction and the pursuit 
and
  conviction of those who violate the Geneva Convention, such a provision  
consequently
  would be violative of   International Humanitarian Law and ultra vires  the 
statute of the 
  Criminal Court itself and the objectives and purposes with which it was 
constituted .
  This may be examined by associations of jurists and those presently seized 
with
  interpreting the statute , namely whether the ICC can exclude from its 
jurisdiction
  those who have violated the Geneva Conventions or any other International
  Convention which mandates universal jurisdiction . In this context can the
  UK proceed to amend its war crimes act????????

   On Haiti it is absolutely necessary for the blockade on International Relief
  to be defeated by every  means , including by calling upon US marines to
  co-operate with the International effort to provide relief as disobedience
  of ILLEGAL ORDERS TO PREVENT RELIEF REACHING IS NOT
  A CRIME WHEREAS DENYING AND OBSTRUCTING  RELIEF BY ANY 
  MILITARY PERSONNEL OR HEAD OF STATE WOULD AMOUNT
  TO GENOCIDE AND A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY .
       
    However please do  carry some of the articles on the recent judgment of the
  US Supreme Court  on your website .

           Niloufer Bhagwat

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to