lukas wirz schrieb am Montag, 25. August 2025 um 22:28:03 UTC+2:
> I do think it is about time Hugin/panotools switched to git. There is a lot > to like about mercurial, but git won. Also switching to git would make > migration away from sourceforge easier if that needed to happen. Yes, git would be an improvement, and I'm pretty sure there is no downside other than the one-time work of switching. I'm not saying that isn't work of course. I prefer currently Mercurial. Especially the GUI provides function like a fine grained selection of chunks to commit I haven't seen in git. What would have an even higher benefit to me would be to use a platform where patches can be contributed through pull requests or similar, instead of uploading patches as single files / zipped collections of files. Sourceforge provides merge request ( https://sourceforge.net/p/hugin/hugin/merge-requests/ ). But they are seldom used. Thomas -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/36fe2f65-2ac6-4454-ad53-b745d763266fn%40googlegroups.com.
