Hi, Craig!

Someone sent me the BigTIFF executor to generate BigTIFF files. Here it is:

[General]
Description=Normal panorama, BigTIFF
StepCount=2
IntermediateImageType=tif

[Step0]
Description=Remapping images
Type=remap
Arguments=--bigtiff -v -r ldr -m TIFF

[Step1]
Description=Updating metadata
Type=exiftool
Result=%prefix%.tif
Arguments=-overwrite_original -TagsFromFile %image0% -ImageDescription -Make -Model -Artist -WhitePoint -Copyright -GPS:all -DateTimeOriginal -CreateDate -UserComment -ColorSpace -OwnerName -SerialNumber %result%

Copy paste that into a text file called bigtiff.executor. Put that file into the ~/.local/share/hugin folder. Sorry, I only use Linux, so I don't know where it belongs on Windows. MacOS is probably similar to Linux, but I don't know that, either. I suppose other folk on the list know those platforms.

To use it on a particular panorama project, open the project in Hugin. To run the executor from the main Hugin GUI, simply load the executor file using the Output menu option and select the "User defined output..." item.

Note: My Linux set up has BigTIFF support. I don't know what happens on systems without BigTIFF support; I'd guess an error message?

On 6/24/25 21:08, Craig B wrote:

I read about bigtiff but at least on the GUI there was no way to turn it on and when I tried entering the switch in the output parameters it threw an error and would not output anything at all. I tried 2-3 times and after 30-40 minutes stitching/blending it would throw the error and terminate. Maybe I missed something on how one would enable it?
On Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 10:15:35 PM UTC-7 GnomeNomad wrote:

    Re TIF format and big file sizes...I've found out (thanks to folk
    on this list) that Hugin supports BigTIFF format. That can handle
    enormous file sizes, such as 1 terapixel. You might try that.

    <http://www.bigtiff.org/>


    On June 24, 2025 6:44:01 PM HST, Craig B <[email protected]> wrote:

        So in the end I had issues exporting the files from Hugin with
        respect to file size limits (1.24GP at 16 bit did not play
        nicely with TIF format.)
        I switched to AutoPano Giga because it has the ability to
        export a PSB file with all the layers included as aligned. In
        the end it was quite obvious that several of my source photos
        were faulty and both Hugin and APG did a decent job blending
        them as much as possible without seams. In the end I manually
        finished the panorama with manual blending and color/tone
        correction on the manually blended areas using the exported
        panorama as a skeleton.

        Between the two I would say that Hugin is more powerful and
        definitely easier to edit the control points, but APG is more
        capable when it comes to export formats and generates CPs
        faster and more accurately, but it is much slower for
        previewing the aligned panorama. I'll be keeping both because
        I see each having a valid role and either will perform well
        when it comes to a panorama shot without as much shifting as I
        imparted in mine.

        On Sunday, May 11, 2025 at 4:29:14 AM UTC-7 lukas wirz wrote:

            Hi Craig,

            > The left
            > side is worse than the right it looks like, and some are
            worse than others,
            > but overall the centers are sharper.

            Indeed, the left side is also worse than the right side, I
            had missed
            that. Then the cropping should be asymmetric of course,
            unless the
            images can be improved.

            > This subject is a Cistus (hybrid probably) flower. I
            specialize in
            > ultraviolet-induced visible fluorescence floral
            photography but I started
            > exploring UVIVF floral microscopy during a project and
            wanted to continue
            > doing it. The first panorama I did was a Phacelia and it
            was small enough
            > Capture One handled it.

            I found your other non-pano Phacelia, very nice!

            > The learning curve is steep, but I'm seeing how powerful
            it is. I am
            > impressed with the focus stacking as well. Everyone
            always touts Zerene and
            > Helicon as the only reasonable options, but Hugin does
            it rather well. I
            > use Zerene or else I'd probably do Hugin for my stacks.
            As challenging as
            > it is with the GUI, for everyone who did it/does it with
            CLI I am really
            > impressed.
            >
            > For now, I'll try your cropping concept since the result
            you shared looks
            > generally satisfactory at this point and more consistent
            than my output.

            In my proof of concept the control points could have been
            optimised
            further, there was still room for improvement.

            I gave the strategy of just fusing the images another try
            because it
            really should work. While hugin seems to refuse to put
            non-overlapping
            images into the same stack there is no such problem for
            enfuse itself.
            So, one can generate individual remapped + not-exposure
            corrected images
            from hugin and feed them into enfuse on the command line
            and get the
            intended output (enfuse image1.tif image2.tif -o out.tif).
            I tried that
            with a few different fusing options: entropy and contrast
            do work but
            the differences between 0.0 (off) and 1.0 (max) are only
            visible in a
            difference image. Soft-mask vs hard-mask are noticeably
            different but
            I'm undecided which is better (probably soft-mask which is
            also the
            default). There are plenty more options that I haven't
            tried, but if
            this is an approach that works well otherwise you could
            spend some time
            with that.
            Hard-mask vs soft-mask:
            http://78.46.190.157:8080/cistus_fused.tgz (1040mb).

            I don't know if this is a better approach than what I
            suggested
            previously. Pure fusing fares better with blurry regions
            while blending
            does better with minor parallax and aligned issues -- so
            it depends on
            the input images.

            > I'll keep going and if I discover anything new/edifying
            or if I come to any
            > serious conclusion about the source of my aberrations, I
            will post back if
            > you're interested in seeing it through.

            It is always interesting to hear what finally worked!


            cheers, lukas wirz

--
David W. Jones
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
My password is the last 8 digits of π.

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c8f4bc62-abff-4218-aa4f-cfd129a117c7%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to